This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
eDiscovery Assistant, a platform for e-discoverycaselaw and resources, today announced its rebranding as Minerva26. The platform, which provides a curated database of caselaw, […] The platform, which provides a curated database of caselaw, […]
At the time of the spoliation motion, discovery was incomplete and no milestone for filing summary judgment motions had been set. Of course, all counsel are duty bound to promptly notify opposing counsel and the court when they have learned that relevant evidence has been spoliated. That is much like the timing of spoliation motions.
Editor’s Note: The June 2025 edition of the 5 Great Reads Newsletter from ComplexDiscovery OÜ offers a curated snapshot of the rapidly evolving intersections between cybersecurity, legal discovery, and artificial intelligence. Sparked by a Maryland case involving a falsified audio recording, this article—anchored in the work of Maura R.
It can also help with legal research, finding relevant caselaws or statutes quickly without endless hours of manual searching. AI-Powered Legal Research Tools AI legal research tools take the hassle out of finding caselaw, statutes, and precedents. What makes it so useful is how accurate and consistent it is.
eDiscovery Tools Legal research and eDiscovery tools give you a simpler and more efficient way to manage discovery and analysis. Unlike traditional discovery, which requires manual review of documents and evidence, eDiscovery lets you automate searches, categorization, and information gathering.
As AI systems begin drafting contracts, summarizing caselaw, and even preparing court submissions, they are also reshaping professional liability, redefining responsibility, and raising urgent questions about the role of human judgment in an increasingly automated legal landscape. This brings us to the deeper cultural shift underway.
In legal practice, this same form of bias allows generative tools to draft clauses, retrieve relevant caselaw, or predict document responsiveness. For example, when a user types a misspelled word, an autocorrect feature suggests the most probable correction—not randomly, but based on data-derived likelihoods.
As to one document, the Courts review of the substance of each of the redacted paragraphs makes clear that the letter involves the application of legal principles relevant to discovery and evidence preservation to guide the future conduct of Defendants. DISCOVERY OF LITIGATION HOLD NOTICES HAS LONG BEEN AN ISSUE. Grimm (ret.)
16, 2024)(citing cases: “Defendants included general and boilerplate objections in their responses to discovery, which are not acceptable in this circuit. Defendants’ responses are a perfect example of how not to answer discovery requests. See General Objections, Dracula, and “Whac a Mole” (Apr. Griffith Lab’ys, Inc.,
The decision begins: Before the Court is a discovery dispute that underscores the importance of counsel fashioning clear and comprehensive agreements when navigating the perils and pitfalls of electronic discovery. When it comes to discovery of text messages, Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f)(3)(B) provides an under-used tool. Emphasis added].
. “To enable more precision in search, we added more than 250 new attorney editors to mark up and classify caselaw in more useful ways for our customers.”
In the ongoing case of Sam Bankman-Fried and his failed crypto exchange FTX, the growing volume of evidence highlights the new landscape of ediscovery challenges when it comes to the breadth of new data sources showing up in corporate litigation.
By John Patzakis The Best Evidence Rule, as codified in Federal Rule of Evidence 1002, provides that an original writing, recording, or photograph is required to prove the contents of the document. A case out of the federal courts in Texas addressed this issue head on.
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
When they were unable to do so, they submitted competing suggestions, and, the United States Magistrate Judge then issued a Protocol and Order Governing Discovery (the ESI Order) establishing such a protocol. The Local Rule permitted the court to apportion costs of discovery of ESI. The City Defendants objected to the ESI Order.
34 discovery requests propounded by defendant Meta Platforms, Inc., The choice of the test may, and often does, impact the outcome of a discovery dispute. The Social Media Adolescent Addiction court wrote: “Ultimately, the control issue under Rule 34 is governed by federal law. 467, 482-92 (2016).
By John Patzakis As we have mentioned many times, nearly every litigation matter involves social media evidence. If your case does not feature such important evidence, it is likely because you are not looking for it. Similarly, you have put some effort to tune into the torrential rivers of social media evidence.
citing Pouncing on Little Ambiguities Leads to Discovery Sanctions (Sept. Sometimes Discovery Disputes Do Not Bring Out the Best in Us (June 20, 2024). When all the evidence is reviewed, it is clear that defendant believed it could comply with the contracts by delivering stewing chicken in the 2 1/2-3 lbs. 1, 2024).
Introduction In today’s digital age, electronic discovery, or eDiscovery, plays a crucial role in the legal process. Understanding eDiscovery eDiscovery refers to the process of identifying, preserving, collecting, processing, reviewing, and producing electronic evidence during legal proceedings.
Because they are relatively new, there is a “relative dearth of caselaw addressing geofence warrants.” That two-thirds of active Google users have not enabled Location History is strong evidence to the contrary…. “Chatrie voluntarily exposed his location information to Google by opting in to Location History.”
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. Harvard would contribute the law books and run the scanning process inside the law library. Ultimately, by mid-2015, the deal had taken shape.
7 CR 37, in turn, addresses sanctions for a broad spectrum of discovery misconduct ranging from incomplete answers to discovery requests to the failure to comply with discovery orders. In addition to CR 11 and CR 37, see also CR 26(g) (certifications on discovery responses), Fed. 2d 130, 916 P.2d 2d 411 (1996).
THE ORIGINAL INTENT In drafting the UFLAA, the ULC incorporated by reference a state’s existing arbitration law, with specific attention given to family law, such as property division, alimony, and marital agreements. The applicable law under the UFLAA is RCW 26.14.030(1). Arbitration decisions are reviewed “de novo.”
They also give lawyers the statutes, caselaw, and legal commentary about the cases. E-Discovery and Digital Forensics: Electronic discovery (e-discovery) has become a crucial aspect of modern litigation. This assists legal teams in building stronger cases.
She founded ClearBrief in 2020 to leverage AI to analyze documents and suggest relevant evidence and citations to streamline drafting. By uploading case documents and discovery materials, the AI can pull facts and quotes directly from the record to support legal arguments in the brief. Like we’re I love the strategy. And we won.
Legal professionals across Europe and the UK are facing growing challenges due to increasing volumes of digital evidence and cross-border legal complexities, making the introduction of DISCO’s AI-driven solutions timely and highly relevant.
The study provides empirical evidence on the dual impact of large language models on human creativity. For instance, using LLMs to structure initial drafts or offer diverse caselaw examples can streamline workflows. published as a preprint in September 2024.
It’s particularly useful in the legal industry for evidence preservation, managing intellectual property rights, and securing transaction records. AI-Powered Legal Research Platforms Research platforms that utilize AI can sift through vast amounts of legal data, including statutes, caselaws, and regulations, at unprecedented speeds.
Their work frees up lawyers to focus on case strategy. Paralegals Paralegals spend the bulk of their time on legal or case-related tasks, such as: Conducting legal research and discovery: Paralegals access databases and books to identify and document regulations and precedents that apply to a specific case.
Fucile In the course of a case, litigators typically make all sorts of statements to courts on the facts and the law. 1 In other situations, however, litigators make specific representations of fact or law based on personal knowledge. 2 Some are in briefs, while others are made in open court. and the withdrawal rule, RPC 1.16.
And while I think some of the most exciting use cases for this technology is uploading your own documents, right, we were talking before we started about, you know, pointing it at all of the documents in your litigation, the transcripts, the correspondence, discovery, etc. That is at the heart of litigation.
In Wells , the appellate court held that there was probable cause to find that the Google location history database would contain evidence of the offense, if it revealed any information at all. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model. Emphasis added].
Stuart, “Privacy in Discovery After Dobbs,” 26 Va. 257 (2023); and, 2 Shue, Vergari, State Computer Law § 8:2027. We decline to consider the unreported caselaw that Petitioners refer to on this point.” Courts frequently admit evidence “for what it’s worth.” “Weight” is decided by the finder of fact. & Tech.
Bob Dole attacked a sitting federal district court judge for ruling evidence inadmissible in a case against a drug courier and indicated they would support the judges removal. They are listed in Protecting the Judiciary Again E-Discovery LLC (Feb. Emphasis added]. I have written a number of blogs on this topic. 28, 2025).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content