Expert Witness Blog
JUNE 25, 2025
This case addressed the admissibility and reliability of expert testimony related to property value diminution caused by perceived risks of pipeline proximity—commonly known as “stigma damages.” Background of the Case UGI Sunbury LLC, a natural gas company, constructed a 35-mile pipeline in central Pennsylvania. 3d 825 (3d Cir.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
After setting out the boilerplate on scope of discovery and requirements for a protective order, the Court wrote: “The burden is on the party resisting discovery to explain specifically why its objections, including those based on irrelevance, are proper given the broad and liberal construction of federal discovery rules.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
WA Bar News
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
PART 2: NEW PATHWAYS TO LICENSURE APPROVED IN CONCEPT BY WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT—NOW UNDER CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PATHWAY QUESTIONS Q: Is Washington alone in creating alternative pathways to licensure? Are we “dumbing down” lawyer admissions in Washington so everyone gets in? In Indiana, Admission and Discipline Rule 2.1
Expert Witness Blog
MARCH 7, 2025
2015), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas addressed the admissibility of expert testimony in a lawsuit involving allegations of human trafficking and substandard living conditions. n the case of Marimuthu v. Signal International , No. 1:13-cv-00498 (E.D.
Complex Discovery
DECEMBER 8, 2024
In war crime investigations, accurate geospatial data aids in constructing a coherent timeline of events, verifying the presence or absence of actors in disputed zones, and ensuring compliance with evidentiary standards that require clear and reliable records.
Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy
JULY 10, 2023
For the subject, Kassin explains that custody is “inherently a psychological construct” DUPED, 331, one where the nature of an interview/interrogation may create the sense that ‘I can’t leave.’ Custody is a pivotal construct. Special note must be paid to Miranda and the necessary trigger of “custody.” No custody, no warnings.
Forensic Psychologist
FEBRUARY 15, 2020
Judges rule that any weaknesses in his method should go to the “weight” that jurors give Dr. Harm’s opinions, rather than the admissibility of his tests. Attorneys may try to challenge him in court, but their protests usually fall flat. Psychological tests hold a magical allure as objective truth.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content