Admissibility Cross-Complaint Cross-Examination 
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 3, 2025
She claimed that her complaint led to her termination on August 26, 2022. The Court recited the key facts: “Plaintiff cites additional explicit text messages between herself and Mr. Roberts in her Complaint.” “At The Court ordered a forensic examination of the work phone by James Vaughn of iDiscovery Solutions. “Mr.
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 22, 2025
And when they do, the consequences can be stark – and potentially irreversible by the Executive’s own admission [in Abrego Garcia v. And, it also suggests that the Complaint does not identify any waiver of sovereign or absolute judicial immunity, and asserts that there is none in circumstances such as this.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
WA Bar News
JULY 10, 2024
The Task Force was directed to “examine current and past bar examination methods, passage rates, and alternative licensure methods, assess disproportionate impacts on examinees of color and first generation examinees, consider the need for alternatives to the current bar exam, and analyze those potential alternatives.” SIDEBAR No.
Complex Discovery
MAY 30, 2025
Editor’s Note: This featured article from ComplexDiscovery O provides an examination of one of the most compelling sessions from the 2025 Dublin Tech Summit, where AI transcended analytics and delved into the emotional core of human experience. We’ve crossed the line.” But this wasn’t science fiction.
E-Discovery LLC
NOVEMBER 29, 2024
As to “trigger,” see generally Is Marking Documents as “Work Product” an Admission that the Duty to Preserve is Triggered? Further, “Plaintiff has been prejudiced by this spoliation because she has no way of knowing the contents of the emails or cross-examining the defendants about them. citation omitted). emphasis added].
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content