E-Discovery LLC

JULY 3, 2025

The Court ordered a forensic examination of the work phone by James Vaughn of iDiscovery Solutions. “Mr. The Court pointed to several salient facts: “Curiously, Plaintiff testified at deposition that she had not even retained a lawyer until nearly one month after the call.” “But Roberts was fired the next day.

Evidence

E-Discovery LLC

JULY 22, 2025

And when they do, the consequences can be stark – and potentially irreversible by the Executive’s own admission [in Abrego Garcia v. And if this suit succeeds, it will not be the last – and the next suit could name the [United States Court of Appeals for the] Fourth Circuit [1] and cause greater disruption still.

Cross-Complaint

Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips

JANUARY 15, 2025

GOALS OF CROSS EXAMINATION Lawyers sometimes fail to prepare for cross examination in the same way they do other parts of the trial. Thats why cross examination is often not only unsuccessful but, boring. Great trial lawyers plan their cross examination and have specific goals in mind.

Cross-Examination

E-Discovery LLC

AUGUST 31, 2024

This first blog addresses the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. He examined 25 to 35 hours of video and found footage depicting the shooting at about 12:17 a.m. Second , while the source materials “need not be introduced into evidence,” they must be “otherwise admissible.”

Admissibility

E-Discovery LLC

NOVEMBER 29, 2024

Doe complained of alleged piecemeal document production and, after deposition, “grew concerned” that relevant documents had not been produced. As to “trigger,” see generally Is Marking Documents as “Work Product” an Admission that the Duty to Preserve is Triggered? She sued officers and the Town. citation omitted).

Burden Of Proof