Remove Admissibility Remove Discovery Remove Objections
article thumbnail

Document Correlation Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b)(2)(E)

E-Discovery LLC

E-Discovery LLC (Jul. It is axiomatic that discovery responses themselves have significant evidentiary value as they constitute party admissions. But without a clear connection between the discovery requests and the corresponding responses, the discovery responses cannot be deemed reliable. Discovery Plan” (Jan.

article thumbnail

Motion to Dismiss Filed by Judges of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

E-Discovery LLC

And when they do, the consequences can be stark – and potentially irreversible by the Executive’s own admission [in Abrego Garcia v. The memorandum states that this stay of approximately two days is much less than the Fourth Circuit’s stay of 14-days that has been in effect for years, without objection, citing Standing Ord.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Defendant’s Prejudice From Plaintiff’s Failure to Disclose Photographs Taken by Defendant Was Insufficient to Support an Exclusionary Discovery Sanction

E-Discovery LLC

. __, 2025 WL 1540660 (May 30, 2025), the defendant City claimed unfair surprise when plaintiff sought to introduce at trial photographs that the City had taken, but which plaintiff had not disclosed in discovery. In discovery, defendant asked for all photos, and any documents on which plaintiff intended to rely on at trial.

article thumbnail

E-Discovery 101 – – A Refresher on the Scope of Discovery + Boilerplate Objections Sustained

E-Discovery LLC

9, 2024), provides a succinct summary of the scope of discovery under the December 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It – surprisingly – sustained boilerplate objections. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.” 26; see XTO Energy, Inc.

article thumbnail

“Boilerplate” Objections Are Generally Condemned; Except When They’re Not

E-Discovery LLC

27, 2024), “boilerplate” objections were sustained on the specific facts presented. BOILERPLATE OBJECTIONS HAVE GENERALLY BEEN CONDEMNED Boilerplate objections have generally been condemned. See General Objections, Dracula, and “Whac a Mole” (Apr. In Jacobs v. The Journal Publishing Co., 2024 WL 4333199 (D.

article thumbnail

What Objections May Be Raised to a Subpoena by a Non-Party?

E-Discovery LLC

July 22, 2024), the Court addressed the type of objections that a subpoenaed non-party may make. Both the husband and wife sought discovery from TST. TST objected on, inter alia , lack of relevance and overbreadth. With no other factual predicate to support the objection, it was overruled. In Trusted Sci. &

article thumbnail

Privilege Objections Denied Without Prejudice

E-Discovery LLC

non-party TEDCO’s blanket privilege and work product objections to a subpoena were denied; however, it lived to fight another day because the denial was without prejudice to file supported objections after a “meet and confer.” Specific objections are required. And, ImpactHR responded without objection. 7, 2022). [2]