article thumbnail

The Proportional Request for Production

Joshua Gilliland

Both need to conduct effective reasonable inquiry into their case theories. That will most likely take shape with expert forensic reports, early case assessment, and effective document review. Both require analyzing the facts.

article thumbnail

Automating the Tedium: What AI-Powered Transcription and Summaries Can (and Can’t) Do for Legal Teams

Optima Juris

This isnt just a time-saverit helps teams align facts earlier in the case lifecycle. Segmenting long transcripts into themes AI can tag recurring topics, like liability, damages, or procedural objections, and surface where they appear across a document. Nor can they determine whether a statement actually matters to your case theory.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Jury Bias: Uncovering its Influence on Trials

Jury Analyst

Pseudoscience is based on subjectivity and intuition rather than objectivity and empiricism. Science is only meant to objectively test whether or not those intuitions hold up when put to the test. Attorneys may have preconceived notions about what makes a good juror generally and speaking and based on their own intuitive case theories.

article thumbnail

The Power of Confirmation Bias: Uncovering its Influence on Trials

Jury Analyst

Pseudoscience is based on subjectivity and intuition, rather than objectivity and empiricism. Science is only meant to objectively test whether or not those intuitions hold up when put to the test. You can determine a good juror by how much you like their face. Pseudoscientific ideas are often perpetuated by confirmation bias.