E-Discovery LLC

JULY 31, 2025

Parties may use any instructions, definitions, or rules of construction that are consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This Court has stated that the use of reasonable definitions may be helpful. For example, Local Civil Rule 26.3 Diversified Products Corp.

Interrogatories

E-Discovery LLC

AUGUST 1, 2025

He later sought to enforce the agreement. His spouse replied that the agreement had not been timely accepted and was a nullity.

Discovery

IP Watchdog

AUGUST 5, 2022

The appellate court ruled that the district court’s construction of a contested limitation within claim 1 was supported by the patent’s specification. Smith’s patent covering a hot-water heater system was both infringed by Bradford White and not invalid.

Construction

IP Watchdog

MARCH 14, 2023

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential ruling Monday that vacated and remanded a district court ruling on patent infringement in a case between Amazon and AlterWAN.

Construction

Expert Witness Blog

MAY 15, 2024

Summary: Construction Expert Witness testimony excluded because the court ruled that the expert cannot state that the Chinese drywall caused the plaintiffs’ injuries Facts: This case ( Fozard et al v. The court ruled that Ehrsam cannot state that the Chinese drywall caused the plaintiff’s injuries.

Construction

IP Watchdog

FEBRUARY 14, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion on Monday that reversed and vacated in part a previous lower court ruling in a patent case related to fuel tank sensors.

Construction

E-Discovery LLC

MARCH 26, 2025

Such obdurate behavior in this case lacks justification, defies the bounds of expected professional behavior, and was seemingly deployed to harass Defense Counsel and thwart any meaningful and constructive attempts at resolving the parties disputes. would include litigate, litigation, litigating, etc.).

Discovery