This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
District Court for the Western District of Washington in an infringement suit brought by Genuine Enabling Technology (Genuine) against Nintendo Company and Nintendo of America (collectively “Nintendo”) for allegedly infringing certain claims of Genuine’s U.S. 6,219,730 (‘730 patent).
district courts handling claim construction are to construe a patent’s independent claims in light of limitations included in dependent claims. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Littelfuse, Inc. Mersen USA EP Corp. clarifying how U.S.
As the world continues to undergo rapid technological advancements, the legal industry has not been left behind (although some lawyers may wish it was). With emerging new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, many people have started considering what legal software might mean for the legal profession’s future.
McKINNEY, Texas (AP) — At the start of every work day, construction worker Charles Smith puts on the essentials: hard hat. Safety glasses. A reflective vest. And a small, watch-like band for his wrist. But rather than track time, its …
On October 16, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in CAO Lighting, Inc. Feit Electric Co., vacating a summary judgment entered by the Central District of California that found Feit Electric did not infringe semiconductor light source patent claims asserted by CAO Lighting.
Editor’s Note: Meta’s recent courtroom win in an AI copyright lawsuit marks a pivotal moment for professionals navigating the intersection of emerging technologies and intellectual property law. The company also highlighted the role of fair use as a foundational element for technological advancement. </span?
Without the benefit of an appellate court’s reasoned analysis of arguments raised on appeal, IP attorneys and professionals are left grasping for answers from PTAB rulings without knowing for certain whether the PTAB’s construction of obviousness doctrine is proper.
Editor’s Note: Technology is no longer a support function in private equity—it’s a strategic imperative. For professionals in cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery, the implications are clear: technology isn’t just enhancing value; it’s becoming the value. PE deal volume hit $838.5 billion—a 19.3%
The circuit judges vacated the ruling, which found Amazon did not infringe on two AlterWAN patents for internet network technology. The CAFC found the stipulation to be vague and lacking detail, and thus vacated the ruling and sent it back to the district court.
Contract management software and recent technology like artificial intelligence and natural language processing are helping law firms and legal departments confront the many challenges of contracts. Contracts are hard. Both ubiquitous and impenetrable, they are read by many and understood by few.
DLD Insurance Brokers specializes in serving companies in the construction, real estate, manufacturing, medical device and technology sectors. PCF Insurance Services acquired the insurance business of DLD Insurance Brokers in Irvine, California. PCF Insurance Services is headquartered in Lindon, Utah, …
Wade has specialized in property/casualty insurance for construction, manufacturing, health care and technology sectors, Hub said in … Hub International Ltd., a global insurance brokerage and financial services firm, has acquired Wade Associates, an independent agency with offices in North Carolina.
On October 4, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part the claim construction and summary judgment of non-infringement ruling made by the U.S. The patents are unrelated but share a similar specification disclosing a networking technology that allegedly improves upon prior methods of communication.
District Court for the District of Delaware, which had granted judgment of non-infringement for Ford Motor Company on three patents owned by Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (EBS). The CAFC, with Chief Judge Moore writing, said the district court’s ruling was based on an erroneous claim construction.
Editors Note: The construction industry faces unique and evolving eDiscovery challenges, from managing vast data volumes to safeguarding sensitive communications and project plans. HaystackIDs webcast will provide construction attorneys with a practical blueprint for leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline eDiscovery processes.
The structural limitations of the dome meant creative engineering: the arena roof was built on the ground and lifted into place, with the arena itself constructed beneath. Workshops and keynotes will focus on tangible strategies to integrate emerging technologies, from document automation to AI-driven litigation analytics.
In 2020, SSI Technologies filed a lawsuit against Dongguan Zhengyang Electronic Mechanical LTD (DZEM), alleging infringement of two patents that covered fuel tank sensor technology. SSI accused DZEM of producing systems to reduce emissions for diesel truck engines that infringed U.S.
On May 11, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the claim construction and decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California to exclude evidence relating to damages but vacated its infringement determination and remanded a case alleging that Hulu, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s (CAFC’s) “construction of petitioner’s patent claim was unforeseeable and unjustifiable under the circuit’s prior decisions,” thereby constituting a judicial taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause.
Industry News – Technology Beat The Architecture of Isolation: Cold War Cities and Corporate Silos ComplexDiscovery Staff Estonia’s northeastern coastline harbors one of the most remarkable examples of Cold War secrecy and subsequent transformation in the former Soviet sphere. ” Company Press Release , December 15, 2023.
District Court for the Central District of California from an appeal by Kingston Technology Company LLC, in which the district court held that Kingston willfully infringed U.S. On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision by the U.S. 6,926,544 (‘544 patent) and awarded $7,515,327.40
Designed for legal technology professionals, cybersecurity specialists, and information governance leaders, this discussion emphasized the practical strategies necessary to manage non-traditional electronically stored information (ESI) with defensibility, efficiency, and compliance. What Qualifies as Emerging Data?
On March 31, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Philip Morris Products S.A. International Trade Commission affirming a Section 337 ruling by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that blocked the importation and sale of electronic vape tobacco products infringing patents owned by R.J.
Editor’s Note: Navigating the fine line between thoughtful gestures and ethical missteps in the legal technology industry has never been more critical. As the legal technology industry continues to evolve, the need for clear guidelines on accepting gifts, trips, passes, and donations from vendors becomes increasingly urgent.
The underlying case involves a software engineer, Timothy Smith, who stole trade secrets from StrikeLines, a company that uses proprietary technology to identify private, artificial reefs that individuals construct to attract fish and then sells the coordinates.
Editor’s Note: As the Russo-Ukrainian Wars large-scale phase enters its 1,018th day, the battlefield remains a dynamic and unforgiving theater of strategic maneuvering and technological innovation. Ukrainian Resilience and Technological Innovations Ukrainian forces, however, have maintained their resilience.
The underlying case involves a software engineer, Timothy Smith, who stole trade secrets from StrikeLines, a company that uses proprietary technology to identify private, artificial reefs that individuals construct to attract fish and then sells the coordinates.
Provisur Technologies, Inc. The Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB on claim construction and also found that the Board misapplied CAFC precedent on the level of public dissemination required before printed publications can qualify as prior art. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision in Weber, Inc.
His perspective aligns with broader concerns surrounding venture dynamics, as highlighted by Freestyle Capitals Maria Palma, who emphasized the swift technological advancements and the pressure on investors to maintain pace.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential ruling in Sequoia Technology, LLC v. reversing part of a District of Delaware ruling invalidating digital storage patent claims owned by Sequoia under 35 U.S.C. §
The district court’s decision highlights a clear tension between claim construction and enablement that, if left to stand, could permit pharmaceutical companies to block lower-cost generic medications with patents they did not actually invent.
While you may have great credentials and impressive accomplishments, a lackluster construction will render you virtually indistinguishable from the other lawyers your prospects are considering. If you’re not ready to go that far afield, here are seven steps you can take right now to infuse authenticity and some fresh ideas into your bio: 1.
Technology advancements are altering how people work. These developments have aided attorneys in developing profitable and effective legal practices, demonstrating that technology is unquestionably improving legal practice. Unfortunately, some legal professionals have been reluctant to adopt these innovations. What is Get Tech Smart?
As we look ahead to 2024, emerging dynamics like economic factors, talent retention, and technology adoption present potential profitability challenges for law firms. From economic shifts to the integration of emerging technologies, the challenges are as diverse as they are significant. Read more: Does SEO Work for Law Firms?
Following a claim construction hearing, the district court found that the disputed (1) “code”/“application” limitations and (2) “system” limitations of the patents-in-suit were invalid as indefinite. The CAFC concluded that the disputed claim limitations were not drafted in means-plus-function format, and therefore 35 U.S.C. § Patent Nos.
Baron, explores the current state of LLMs in legal discovery and evaluates their potential against established methods such as technology-assisted review (TAR). Currently, the legal community has embraced technology-assisted review (TAR) as a reliable method for managing large-scale document reviews. Grossman, Gordon V.
The most common security policies cover disaster recovery planning, acceptable use criteria, and password construction guidelines. Mainly, though, they boost your ability to take a byte out of cybercrime and to prevent technical glitches from creating major disruptions. Monitor the “dark web.”
Embrace technologyTechnology can be a powerful tool for legal department management. From matter management software to document automation tools, there are numerous technologies available to help streamline legal processes and improve efficiency.
We used a technology called optical character recognition (“OCR”) to extract all the case text from the scanned images. OCR technology is much improved, and it’s not too hard to redo the OCR to get better results. The real contribution was constructing the robust “plumbing” through which we could deliver the data to others.
and Mach7 Technologies, Inc. Since AI Visualize’s Amended Complaint provided no further information about the eligibility of the claims and neither party asked for claim construction, the district court reviewed the eligibility of the claims and concluded they were all ineligible. AI Visualize sued Nuance Communications, Inc.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content