Remove Court Rules Remove Discovery Remove Interrogatories
article thumbnail

Spoliation Discovery Permitted

E-Discovery LLC

7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in this lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. The court permitted spoliation interrogatories. Plaintiffs supplemental response stated: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as compound. Defendants Interrogatory No.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

11 ChatGPT Prompts to Transforming Your Legal Practice

Lawmatics

4 Streamlining Case Law Research Prompt: "Summarize the following recent Federal Circuit Court rulings on the Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrine, focusing on decisions involving digital privacy issues. It's ideal for general legal research or when updating client advisory materials.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Wake Up Call Revisited: Read the Rules & Don’t Argue “Not Reasonably Calculated” in Federal Courts

E-Discovery LLC

19, 2025)(Emphasis added), the court wrote: Throughout his responses, Canales objects to OPWs requests on the ground that they are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. See Reasonably Calculated to Lead to Discovery of Admissible Evidence (Nov. Rule 33 Advisory Comm. Bartow Ins.

article thumbnail

Discovery Rulings in Abrego-Garcia v. Noem Deportation Case

E-Discovery LLC

plaintiffs notified the Court of seemingly intractable discovery disputes. The case is before the District Court after the United States Supreme Courts ruling in Noem v. Initially, the Court addressed four general objections. Youll cite privilege, youll follow the rules, Ill make a determination.),

Discovery 211