Remove Court Rules Remove Discovery Remove Subpoenas
article thumbnail

Do You Know About the “Touhy” Regulations?

E-Discovery LLC

17, 2025), applies the “ Touhy ” Regulations to a federal subpoena directed to a government contractor. The court wrote: The Federal Housekeeping Statute, 8 U.S.C. § Regulations that are promulgated pursuant to § 301 are often referred to as “ Touhy ” regulations following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex rel.

article thumbnail

When Can a Court Deviate from the Child Support Guidelines?

Joseph, Hollander & Craft

A Brief Overview of Missouri’s Child Support Model Missouri family courts determine a parent’s monthly obligation by using a child support calculator which incorporates a number of statutory factors and references child support guidelines established by Missouri Supreme Court rule.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

You Subpoenaed My Documents, Shouldn’t You Pay for Them?

Percipient

Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. The court denied the reimbursement request. In United States v.

article thumbnail

Court Declines To Compel Employer To Produce Data from Employees’ Personal Mobile Devices

Discovery Advocate

Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.

article thumbnail

Court Declines To Compel Employer To Produce Data from Employees’ Personal Mobile Devices

Discovery Advocate

Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.

article thumbnail

Apr./May 2025 > Discipline & Other Regulatory Notices

WA Bar News

THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. South is reinstated to active status to practice law.