E-Discovery LLC

JULY 31, 2025

The court cited a local rule that prohibits use of definitions in interrogatories without leave of court. In pertinent part, Herman objected to the definitions in Payne’s interrogatories. The Payne court wrote: [T]his Court’s local rules explicitly prohibit definitions without the Court’s leave.

Interrogatories

E-Discovery LLC

FEBRUARY 23, 2025

7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in this lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. The court permitted spoliation interrogatories. Plaintiffs supplemental response stated: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as compound. Defendants Interrogatory No.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

FEBRUARY 25, 2025

19, 2025)(Emphasis added), the court wrote: Throughout his responses, Canales objects to OPWs requests on the ground that they are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The phrase was deleted from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the December 2015 amendments. Rule 33 Advisory Comm.

Interrogatories

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 23, 2025

The case is before the District Court after the United States Supreme Courts ruling in Noem v. The areas are also relevant and probative as to whether Defendants have made in good faith all reasonable efforts to comply with this Courts Orders. As to Answer to Interrogatory No. As to Interrogatory No.

Discovery