E-Discovery LLC

FEBRUARY 23, 2025

7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in this lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. The court permitted spoliation interrogatories. Plaintiffs supplemental response stated: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as compound. Defendants Interrogatory No.

Discovery 130

Discovery Interrogatories Objections Court Rules 130

Lawmatics

AUGUST 8, 2023

4 Streamlining Case Law Research Prompt: "Summarize the following recent Federal Circuit Court rulings on the Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrine, focusing on decisions involving digital privacy issues. It's ideal for general legal research or when updating client advisory materials.

Legal Research 130

Legal Research Interrogatories Witnesses Legal Strategy 130

E-Discovery LLC

FEBRUARY 25, 2025

On a different, rules-based procedural issue, Canales asserted that contention interrogatories, which are permitted by Fed.R.Civ.P. The Canales court wrote: This argument is unpersuasive for two reasons. First, the Federal Rules provide that methods of discovery may be used in any sequence[.] Rule 33 Advisory Comm.

Interrogatories 130

Interrogatories Objections Discovery Admissibility 130

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 23, 2025

The case is before the District Court after the United States Supreme Courts ruling in Noem v. The areas are also relevant and probative as to whether Defendants have made in good faith all reasonable efforts to comply with this Courts Orders. As to Answer to Interrogatory No. As to Interrogatory No.

Discovery 211

Discovery Interrogatories Objections Court Rules 211