E-Discovery LLC

FEBRUARY 23, 2025

7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in this lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. The court permitted spoliation interrogatories. Plaintiffs supplemental response stated: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as compound. Defendants Interrogatory No.

Discovery 130

Discovery Interrogatories Objections Court Rules 130

E-Discovery LLC

FEBRUARY 25, 2025

19, 2025)(Emphasis added), the court wrote: Throughout his responses, Canales objects to OPWs requests on the ground that they are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The phrase was deleted from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the December 2015 amendments. Rule 33 Advisory Comm.

Interrogatories 130

Interrogatories Objections Discovery Admissibility 130

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 23, 2025

The case is before the District Court after the United States Supreme Courts ruling in Noem v. Initially, the Court addressed four general objections. Then it considered several specific objections. Defendants objection reflects a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations.

Discovery 211

Discovery Interrogatories Objections Court Rules 211