E-Discovery LLC
JULY 28, 2025
17, 2025), applies the “ Touhy ” Regulations to a federal subpoena directed to a government contractor. The court added: “Under these regulations, as a DHS contractor, Defendant [MVM] bears as much responsibility as Plaintiffs to provide Plaintiffs’ discovery requests to DHS. 2025 WL 202303 (S.D. See 6 C.F.R.
Joseph, Hollander & Craft
JULY 10, 2025
A Brief Overview of Missouri’s Child Support Model Missouri family courts determine a parent’s monthly obligation by using a child support calculator which incorporates a number of statutory factors and references child support guidelines established by Missouri Supreme Court rule.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Percipient
APRIL 22, 2023
Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. The court denied the reimbursement request. In United States v.
Discovery Advocate
JUNE 7, 2023
Even where a court rules that a company does not have possession, custody or control of an employee’s text messages pursuant to its BYOD policy or other factors, those text messages still may be discoverable through a subpoena to the employee directly.
Discovery Advocate
JUNE 8, 2023
Even where a court rules that a company does not have possession, custody or control of an employee’s text messages pursuant to its BYOD policy or other factors, those text messages still may be discoverable through a subpoena to the employee directly.
SW&L Attorneys Blog
NOVEMBER 8, 2024
The court ruled this as fraudulent and restored the assets to the marital estate, prioritizing the wife’s right to an equitable division of property. Minnesota courts frequently rely on their findings to detect concealed assets. Subpoena Financial Records. In Peterson v. Peterson (274 Minn. 568, 144 N.W.2d
WA Bar News
APRIL 14, 2025
THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content