Remove Cross-Complaint Remove Discovery Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Should Discovery be Stayed Pending Ruling on Dispositive Motion?

E-Discovery LLC

31, 2025), the court denied defendants request to stay discovery pending a ruling on defendants motion to dismiss the complaint. In denying the request to stay discovery, the Hernandez court first noted that it had wide discretion in controlling discovery. The stay was presented by plaintiffs motion to compel.

Discovery 130
article thumbnail

Divorce Complaint Stricken and Testimony Precluded as Discovery Sanction

E-Discovery LLC

June 28, 2024)(unreported), the intermediate appellate court affirmed a discovery sanction in a divorce action. The action was pending on cross-complaints for limited and absolute divorce. Mrs. Ferko alleged that Mr. Ferko’s discovery responses were inadequate on the issue of marital property.

Discovery 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Cross-Motions to Compel in Employment Lawsuit

E-Discovery LLC

1] The Court resolved cross-motions to compel. Both discovery motions were granted in part and denied in part. The Cooper Court also ordered discovery of a cell phone providers text message log as a useful cross-check on the completeness of discovery. Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., 2025 WL 404246 (D.

article thumbnail

Five Key Points from the Invasion of Privacy Lawsuit Against OpenAI

IP Watchdog

District Court for the District of Northern California, for allegedly stealing private information from millions of internet users.

article thumbnail

No Sanctions for Resetting Two Cellphones on Facts Presented; and, Social Media Posts Supported Dismissal

E-Discovery LLC

The Auxiliary received a complaint from a member of the public about LinkedIn posts that she perceived as sexist, racist, and inappropriate. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model and JD Supra. __ [1] The court denied a motion to compel because Wenzel did not confer with defendants in good faith.

article thumbnail

Protecting Public Expression

WA Bar News

PURPOSE OF ANTI-SLAPP LAWS The purpose of anti-SLAPP laws is to prevent litigants from suing and threatening suit as a means of stifling speech on issues of public concern. It allows a defendant to bring an early summary judgment motion before conducting lengthy and expensive discovery. Expression Prot. Act prefatory note intro.,

Discovery 112
article thumbnail

7 Legal Workflow Examples to Handle Tasks With Less Effort

Percipient

It lays out the exact steps needed to complete something, like drafting a contract, onboarding a client, or preparing for litigation. Keeps Everyone on the Same Page In any legal team, its easy for wires to get crossed. Teams that automate legal workflows in litigation save time and avoid unnecessary delays.