Discovery Exhibits Objections 
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 10, 2025
May 30, 2025), the EEOC prevailed on several discovery disputes. The agency moved to compel discovery responses. The EEOC also asked the court to order Mia Aesthetics to retain an e-discovery vendor. Book Review: “Zubulake’s e-Discovery: The Untold Story of My Search for Justice,” by Ms. Webb sent to management; 3) Ms.
WA Bar News
NOVEMBER 12, 2024
1 The amendments to CR 26 affect objections, supplementation, and disclosure of experts. 1 The amendments to CR 26 affect objections, supplementation, and disclosure of experts. They will require a material change in the way many attorneys practice discovery. Illustration © Getty/benjamin lourenço BY DAN BRIDGES On Sept.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 20, 2024
Life is Short It is also a red flag when the court notes: “Since February of 2023, there have only been rare and brief occasions when the parties did not have some discovery dispute before the court.” There is nothing wrong with a little humor to provide a break in the monotony of this long and tedious discovery war.” June 17, 2024).
E-Discovery LLC
AUGUST 27, 2024
21, 2024), the court wrote: “Before the Court are a litany of motions to seal exhibits to contemporaneously filed briefing on discovery disputes.” The Sazerac court granted a number of those motions; however, it denied the motion to seal a privilege log that had been filed as an exhibit. explain the procedure. Of the Courts v.
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 25, 2024
There were several other discovery disputes and the parties submitted emails, exhibits, and a declaration. Defendants added: According to Defendants, while the parties conducted multiple telephone conferences thereafter regarding Plaintiffs’ complaints as to Defendants’ discovery responses, the privilege log issue was never raised….
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 8, 2024
Plaintiff Boblitt moved for leave to file specific exhibits under seal. The exhibits supported his opposition to a motion of defendant BP for a protective order. While it is not clear to me, it appears that the exhibits were primarily expert reports in other litigation. BP raised other issues. and 105.11. ” Id.
E-Discovery LLC
AUGUST 31, 2024
These videos were admitted into evidence without objection and were contained in about 30 video exhibits. Over objection, Lieutenant McDonald testified that he focused on one of the suspects who wore distinctive attire. The court admitted the composite video over objection. State, 261 Md. 499 (2024). at 533-34. “We
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content