Discovery Subpoenas Witnesses 
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 11, 2025
They included witness interview notes and memoranda. The decision is one part of vigorously-litigated [1] discovery in a civil rights lawsuit. As part of its post-conviction investigation, MAIP created numerous documents between 2005 and 2022, including witness interview notes and internal memoranda. May 30, 2025)(Austin, J.),
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 1, 2025
45 subpoena duces tecum could not have been served on the non-party document custodian and avoided the designation issue. 2025 WL 176001, at *1 (cleaned up; citations and quotations omitted).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Joseph, Hollander & Craft
JULY 31, 2025
Client also agrees that Law Firm will be entitled to full reimbursement for costs incurred in connection with the production of documents in response to subpoenas and demands for the production of documents issued in any such legal proceedings. Sisk, Addressing Witness Coaching by Cross-Examination , 15 St.
E-Discovery LLC
NOVEMBER 27, 2024
20, 2024), the court addressed recovery of expenses by non-parties for responding to a subpoena. 45 (“Subpoena”) states: (b)(1) – Under some circumstances, witness fees and mileage must be paid. [1] d)(3)(B) – A court may, on motion, ensure “that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.” Fed.R.Civ.P.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 4, 2025
the Court set out and applied the principles governing subpoenas and objections to them. The Court explained the dispute: Mr. Hall alleges that BPD and three former officersDonald Licato, Frank Barlow, and John Barrickconcealed exculpatory evidence and coerced false witness testimony during Plaintiffs 1992 murder trial.
Percipient
APRIL 22, 2023
Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. Who covers the expense in responding to it? In United States v. 11 cv 4071 (N.D.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 14, 2025
Hall’s claims arise from the Defendants alleged concealment of exculpatory evidence and coercion of witness testimony during Mr. Halls 1992 murder trial. No Privilege Log is Necessary in Limited Circumstances When Discovery Requests Are Overbroad (Apr. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content