Remove Evidence Remove Exhibits Remove Mediation
article thumbnail

Standard for Court-Ordered Forensic Examinations – When Does Misconduct “Cross the Rubicon”?

E-Discovery LLC

The scales tip in favor of compelling forensic imaging where there exists evidence of either discrepancies in a discovery response or a failure by the responding party to produce requested information. 667, and a motion to seal an exhibit, Dkt. Mintas’ counsel is right. The PlayUp court explained the misconduct in great detail.

article thumbnail

The Bright Legal Future

WA Bar News

Beyond the time and financial strains on our judiciary, AI-generated evidence (both demonstrative visuals and falsified evidence), is beginning to appear in court proceedings, and our judges lack the support to easily address the issues AI creates in their cases. These evidentiary issues will similarly slow court proceedings.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Washington’s New Uniform Family Law Arbitration Act: Explanation, Application, and Aspiration

WA Bar News

But if there is testimony or oral evidence, the issues of how to record the evidence, preserve the evidence, and present it to a subsequent judicial officer must be considered and resolved. 18 An arbitrator exceeds his/her authority within the meaning of RCW 7.04A when the arbitration award exhibits a facial legal error.

article thumbnail

Understanding the Impact of Personality Traits on Jury Deliberation Using Jury Analysis to Leverage Psychographic Information

Jury Analyst

To determine whether a juror may exhibit bias or make irrational decisions, it’s essential to have a comprehensive understanding of the context in which they will make their decision and the stable and enduring characteristics they bring to that setting.