Evidence Insurance Precedent 
Complex Discovery
JULY 23, 2025
Ukraine’s participation in multinational cyber exercises—while under kinetic attack—marks a precedent-setting level of engagement. As geopolitical tensions increase, the Tallinn Mechanism reframes cyber support as mutual digital insurance. The Mechanism’s broader value lies in the institutionalization of collaborative habits.
Practice of Law
JULY 9, 2025
Although it worked within those existing frameworks rather than completely replacing them, it’s still considered revolutionary as it brought health insurance to tens of millions of Americans who didn’t have any before. For example, insurers are required to cover “A” or “B” rated services recommended by the Task Force.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Civil Litigation Brief
APRIL 28, 2025
Today we are looking at a case where the court considered the impact of The Third Party (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 in detail. The court decided that the insurer was not liable to indemnify a claimant who had been.
Complex Discovery
JULY 9, 2024
The outcome of this battle could set a critical precedent for how regulatory agencies engage with the rapidly evolving crypto market, impacting cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals.
WA Bar News
JUNE 11, 2024
should not be considered as evidence. a) prohibits a lawyer from using “means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” Irwin (E.D. Washington RPC 4.4(a) Washington RPC 3.4(a) Teck Metals, Ltd.
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
MARCH 20, 2023
And I sat on the idea, but when I was working as an insurance defense lawyer in Dallas, I was the only female that I saw. But what I did have happen is when I was working as an insurance defense lawyer, I had another female lawyer tell me to be very careful what I wore to court, which I still think a lot of that is true.
Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy
JANUARY 23, 2025
In a capital [death penalty] case in Oklahoma, a wife was accused of conspiring to have her husband killed to then collect insurance proceeds. Supreme Court precedent existed. Because the Constitution matters as a check on errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence. Robinson – [link].]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content