Evidence Objections Subpoenas 
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 16, 2025
It is triggered when a potential party has “some notice that the evidence is potentially relevant to… reasonably foreseeable litigation.” In other words, the trigger analysis is objective, not subjective. Maryland’s High Court Affirms Sanction for Spoliation of Video Evidence Jan. 21, 2024). In one (remarkable?)
Joseph, Hollander & Craft
JULY 10, 2025
Regardless, it is up to the parent who wants a higher monthly payment obligation to present the evidence and arguments in favor of it. It will likely be necessary to subpoena documents such as bank records, medical records, and income statements to get a better grasp of the parents’ ability to pay and the child’s needs.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 15, 2024
July 22, 2024), the Court addressed the type of objections that a subpoenaed non-party may make. That was a novel issue in Maryland. The Court held “that [nonparty] TST had standing to challenge the subpoena on grounds that some of the requests were overbroad and not relevant to the subject matter involved in the divorce action.”
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 4, 2025
the Court set out and applied the principles governing subpoenas and objections to them. The Court explained the dispute: Mr. Hall alleges that BPD and three former officersDonald Licato, Frank Barlow, and John Barrickconcealed exculpatory evidence and coerced false witness testimony during Plaintiffs 1992 murder trial.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 22, 2025
The EEOC served a subpoena on the third-party custodian. Magistrate Judge denied relief and the matter was before the District Judge on objections. The defendants told the EEOC that Mr. Ayers-Banks email account was deleted six months after he filed his charge with the EEOC. The defendants email was administered by a third-party.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 22, 2025
Both sides objected to a report and recommendation of a special master. The Sports Rehab court found that the personal devices were not in Vail Healths possession, custody, or control and that the proper procedure would have been for plaintiffs to issue subpoenas. Vail Clinic, Inc., 2025 WL 1144559 (D. One lesson is clear.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024
1] The States and State Attorneys General “object[ed] to treating their respective state agencies as being subject to party discovery and insist[ed] that all of these agencies are third parties from whom Meta should seek documents by subpoenas under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45.” It moved to compel production.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content