This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This growth in M&A activity points to an increasing demand for legalservices, particularly in compliance, regulatory reviews, and eDiscovery. As transaction volumes rise, so does the complexity of deal-making, requiring more sophisticated document management and regulatory solutions to meet the demands of legal scrutiny.
This boost leads to higher allocations for legalservices, including eDiscovery, to support compliance, litigation, and M&A activities. Conversely, reduced consumer spending can decrease corporate profitability, resulting in tighter legal budgets and increased scrutiny of all expenses, including eDiscovery.
Higher consumer spending generally leads to increased corporate revenues, which can boost legal budgets and, by extension, eDiscovery investments. Legal departments may need to adopt more cost-effective strategies, such as optimizing workflows and negotiating better vendor terms, to manage rising costs.
He became interested in the future of legal education and how artificial intelligence will affect the profession, which led him to co-found Blue J , a legal technology company in Toronto. On the other hand, Abdi Aidid practiced as a commercial litigator in New York before becoming the Vice President of Legal Research at Blue J.
So Stefanie Marrone, outsource marketer to law firms and legalservice providers. But I do think that we are selling to people who want to buy legalservices, and they want to do business with people who they know. This is also why so I don’t just work with law firms, I work with some legalservice providers.
The company provides AI-powered tools to help litigators automate repetitive tasks and work more efficiently. The conversation focuses on LegalMation’s products, overcoming resistance to adopting new legal tech, and predictions for the future evolution of legalservice delivery. Thanks for having me.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content