E-Discovery LLC

JUNE 16, 2025

That duty arises “when a party reasonably should know that the evidence may be relevant to anticipated litigation.” Id. A prudent person acting under like circumstances would have saved and downloaded the Drive Cam footage from the MetroAccess van in anticipation of future litigation. at *3 (quotations and citations omitted).

Expert Testimony 130

Expert Testimony Evidence Rebuttal Litigation 130

WA Bar News

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

1 The amendments to CR 26 affect objections, supplementation, and disclosure of experts. This article will explain the changes effected by the rule amendments and, with respect to CR 26, provide context considered by the Civil Litigation Rules Revision Work Group in drafting the proposed amendments to illustrate their impact.

Depositions 105

Depositions Discovery Objections Exhibits 105

Complex Discovery

JUNE 22, 2025

This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.

Government and Public Sector 59

Government and Public Sector Objections Rebuttal Technology 59

E-Discovery LLC

NOVEMBER 29, 2024

Once a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it is obligated to implement a ‘litigation hold’ to ensure that potentially relevant evidence under its control is identified, located, and preserved for use in the anticipated litigation….” The Court, however, held that the Town had a duty to institute a litigation hold.

Burden Of Proof 130

Burden Of Proof Evidence Discovery Litigation 130