E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 4, 2025

the Court set out and applied the principles governing subpoenas and objections to them. The Court explained the dispute: Mr. Hall alleges that BPD and three former officersDonald Licato, Frank Barlow, and John Barrickconcealed exculpatory evidence and coerced false witness testimony during Plaintiffs 1992 murder trial.

Subpoenas 130

Subpoenas Discovery Objections Witnesses 130

E-Discovery LLC

NOVEMBER 27, 2024

20, 2024), the court addressed recovery of expenses by non-parties for responding to a subpoena. 45 (“Subpoena”) states: (b)(1) – Under some circumstances, witness fees and mileage must be paid. [1] d)(3)(B) – A court may, on motion, ensure “that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.” Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas 130

Subpoenas Discovery Depositions Objections 130

Percipient

APRIL 22, 2023

Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. Who covers the expense in responding to it? In United States v. 11 cv 4071 (N.D.

Subpoenas 97

Subpoenas Discovery Litigation Court Rules 97

WA Bar News

APRIL 14, 2025

Fucile Fact witnesses can make a critical difference in a case. In one instance, the witness might be a bystander to an automobile accident who can say whether the light was green or red. First, for simplicity, we will address fact witnesses who are unrepresented. Their role varies with any given litigation. CONTEXT RPC 3.4(b)

Witnesses 83

Witnesses Depositions Evidence Real Estate 83

Complex Discovery

FEBRUARY 6, 2025

In addition, well discuss how advanced and simple eDiscovery and document review strategies can address specific construction industry challenges, including: Large data sets, subpoena responses, delay claims, defect investigations and litigations, cost overruns, multi-party contract disputes, and regulatory compliance issues.

Construction 52

Construction Education Technology Discovery 52

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 8, 2025

28, 2025), the court granted in part and denied in part a motion to quash subpoenas issued to AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile (the Wayfarer Parties) by Ms. Lang, Ruling in Blake Lively’s Subpoena for Justin Baldoni Phone Records (Feb. Blake Lively. Contextually, the litigation has been described in popular media. 28, 2025); L.

Subpoenas 130

Subpoenas Objections Discovery Admissibility 130