Admissibility Court Rules Discovery 
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 29, 2025
Several years ago, I wrote a blog titled Does Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(i) Mandate “Document Correlation” When ESI is Produced and, If So, Does Metadata Provide a “Work-Around” to Avoid the Costs of That Correlation Process? – E-Discovery LLC (Jul. Rule 34(b) is amended to ensure similar protection for [ESI].”). Discovery Plan” (Jan.
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 28, 2025
. __, 2025 WL 1540660 (May 30, 2025), the defendant City claimed unfair surprise when plaintiff sought to introduce at trial photographs that the City had taken, but which plaintiff had not disclosed in discovery. In discovery, defendant asked for all photos, and any documents on which plaintiff intended to rely on at trial.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
MARCH 6, 2025
3, 2025), the court issued another hyperlinked document discovery decision arising out of the parties ESI Protocol. The court ruled: If it has not already done so, Uber shall produce documents hyperlinked in Google chat messages, and related metadata to the extent feasible. Managing E-Discovery and ESI (ABA 2011), Chap.
SW&L Attorneys Blog
JUNE 18, 2024
From navigating convoluted regulatory frameworks to managing extensive discovery processes, the reality of litigation can overwhelm even the most prepared enterprises. Secured from the supreme court a certificate of admission to the bar of this state; and 2.
Complex Discovery
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
Key recommendations include: Pretrial Evidentiary Hearings: Judges should require early disclosure of potential deepfake-related evidence, enabling discovery and the use of expert witnesses to authenticate digital materials. For eDiscovery professionals, the stakes are particularly high.
Next Generation E-Discovery Law & Tech Blog
AUGUST 30, 2023
In fact, given the unfortunately extensive but erroneous reliance on screenshots of social media evidence, The Best Evidence Rule could be cited far more frequently by opposing counsel seeking to contest the admission of such evidence. A case out of the federal courts in Texas addressed this issue head on.
WA Bar News
JULY 10, 2024
THESE NOTICES OF THE IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS AND ACTIONS are published pursuant to Rule 3.5(c) c) of the Washington Supreme Court Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. The lawyer’s conduct violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.3 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 8.4(b)
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content