E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 30, 2025
E-discovery blazed across the litigation sky more than two decades ago. Ball, Electronic Discovery Workbook (2019), 47 n. E-discovery is more complex than paper discovery; but then, electric lighting is more complex than candles, and cars more complex than bicycles. Marcus, E-Discovery Beyond the Federal Rules, 37 U.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
9, 2024), provides a succinct summary of the scope of discovery under the December 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.” It – surprisingly – sustained boilerplate objections. The case involved a loan gone south.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 27, 2024
In response, “the prosecutor proffered that Sandhu was named in the supplemental discovery documents, which had been disclosed several weeks before the start of trial, but candidly acknowledged that the State had not indicated its intention to call Sandhu as a witness at that time. He asserted self defense. Standford v. State , 416 Md.
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 22, 2024
Among them were: general principles of discovery; the role of counsel in self-collection; discovery on discovery; the date that the litigation hold was triggered; whether reasonable post-trigger steps were taken; curative sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. It insists that it is not conducting unchecked discovery.” See The Hon.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 10, 2025
The Sedona Conference has posted its Commentary on Discovery of Collaboration Platforms Data, Public Comment Version (Apr. 26(b)(1) states that [i]nformation within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable, discoverable material that does not meet evidentiary standards may be of little or limited value.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 19, 2025
Thompson I explained the 2000 change in the scope of discovery that remains in force, with some changes, today. [1] Thompson I explained the 2000 change in the scope of discovery that remains in force, with some changes, today. [1] 2001)( Thompson I ), was a class action by Baltimore public housing residents. Emphasis added].
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 3, 2024
June 28, 2024)(unreported), the intermediate appellate court affirmed a discovery sanction in a divorce action. Mrs. Ferko alleged that Mr. Ferko’s discovery responses were inadequate on the issue of marital property. Ferko then filed two more motions to compel asserting that the discovery responses were deficient.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content