Remove Admissibility Remove Discovery Remove Witnesses
article thumbnail

Defendant’s Prejudice From Plaintiff’s Failure to Disclose Photographs Taken by Defendant Was Insufficient to Support an Exclusionary Discovery Sanction

E-Discovery LLC

. __, 2025 WL 1540660 (May 30, 2025), the defendant City claimed unfair surprise when plaintiff sought to introduce at trial photographs that the City had taken, but which plaintiff had not disclosed in discovery. In discovery, defendant asked for all photos, and any documents on which plaintiff intended to rely on at trial.

article thumbnail

No Sanction for Discovery Failure in Criminal Case

E-Discovery LLC

In response, “the prosecutor proffered that Sandhu was named in the supplemental discovery documents, which had been disclosed several weeks before the start of trial, but candidly acknowledged that the State had not indicated its intention to call Sandhu as a witness at that time. Williams v. State , 416 Md. 670, 698 (2010).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Authentication of Surveillance Video by Lay Witness Under Silent Witness Doctrine

E-Discovery LLC

31, 2024), the intermediate appellate court addressed an important issue of authentication of surveillance video by a lay witness. That witness was permitted to authenticate a video under the silent witness theory. The Appeals Court disagreed and affirmed, applying the silent witness doctrine. State, 487 Md.

article thumbnail

My Most Interesting Blogs From 2024

E-Discovery LLC

Discovery Plan The ESI Protocol: Your Word is Your Bond Or, Is It? Can a witness authenticate a video if the video contains images that the witness did not see? Is a Composite Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer Narrate It at Trial? Mediation of Discovery Disputes by Courts Law Clerk?

article thumbnail

Is a “Composite” Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer “Narrate” It at Trial? – Part 2 of 2

E-Discovery LLC

A prior blog addressed the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. Neither of the testifying detectives witnessed the events about which they testified. at 538. The Maryland Supreme Court recently held that a witness can authenticate a video that contains images the witness did not see.

article thumbnail

Is a “Composite” Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer “Narrate” It at Trial? – Part 1 of 2

E-Discovery LLC

This first blog addresses the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. Second , while the source materials “need not be introduced into evidence,” they must be “otherwise admissible.” This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model. 1003 and 1005. emphasis added).

article thumbnail

Can a witness authenticate a video if the video contains images that the witness did not see?

E-Discovery LLC

Can a witness authenticate a video if the video contains images that the witness did not see? Here, the authenticating witness saw what happened before and after the shooting, as shown on the video, but he did not see the shooting that was also shown on the video. Second , the “silent witness” theory is available.