Remove Admissibility Remove Evidence Remove Witnesses
article thumbnail

(Some) Justice for Weinstein Victims Amidst Mixed Verdict

Practice of Law

The Manhattan court deemed that "prior bad acts" testimony from witnesses unrelated to formal charges had unfairly prejudiced the jury. This decision underscored tensions between state laws and federal doctrines regarding evidence admissibility in sexual violence cases.

article thumbnail

Defendant’s Prejudice From Plaintiff’s Failure to Disclose Photographs Taken by Defendant Was Insufficient to Support an Exclusionary Discovery Sanction

E-Discovery LLC

The Court affirmed the holding that the asserted prejudice from the failure to produce was insufficient to support exclusion of the evidence. It asserted prejudice because it could not call the person who took the photos as a trial witness. Johnson] intended to introduce the photos into evidence’ at trial.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

PROVING THINGS 266: THE BURDEN OF PROOF, HEARSAY EVIDENCE AND WHEN EVIDENCE IS NOT “EXPERT EVIDENCE”: ALSO THE IMPORTANCE OF SERVING A NOTICE OF NON-AUTHENTICITY

Civil Litigation Brief

We are looking, again, at a case where there were issues as to evidence. Part of the defendant's case was that the evidence was not admissible or was hearsay. Hearsay is admissible, the real. The defendant's arguments did not prosper.

article thumbnail

Authentication of Surveillance Video by Lay Witness Under Silent Witness Doctrine

E-Discovery LLC

31, 2024), the intermediate appellate court addressed an important issue of authentication of surveillance video by a lay witness. That witness was permitted to authenticate a video under the silent witness theory. Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Lorraine v.

article thumbnail

Is a “Composite” Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer “Narrate” It at Trial? – Part 2 of 2

E-Discovery LLC

499 (2024), addressed introduction of a “composite” video as summary evidence and the use of police officers’ testimony describing it. A prior blog addressed the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. Neither of the testifying detectives witnessed the events about which they testified. State , 261 Md.

article thumbnail

Can a witness authenticate a video if the video contains images that the witness did not see?

E-Discovery LLC

Can a witness authenticate a video if the video contains images that the witness did not see? Here, the authenticating witness saw what happened before and after the shooting, as shown on the video, but he did not see the shooting that was also shown on the video. Second , the “silent witness” theory is available.

article thumbnail

Is a “Composite” Video Admissible and Can a Police Officer “Narrate” It at Trial? – Part 1 of 2

E-Discovery LLC

499 (2024), addressed introduction of a “composite” video as summary evidence and the use of police officers’ testimony describing it. This first blog addresses the admissibility of a “composite” video prepared by the prosecution. An innocent bystander was fatally shot while she was with her husband on a hotel patio in Annapolis.