E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 5, 2025
12, 2024); No Privilege Log Is Needed While Scope of Discovery Objections Are Pending (Aug. Both Mr. Hall and MAIP objected to the subpoena on a number of bases. The Hall Court added that Plaintiff and MAIP timely asserted privilege in their objections to the subpoena. at *11 (Emphasis added). See generally Fed.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 17, 2025
The Court addressed a number of issues, including the need for particularized objections and a sufficient privilege log. Second , the Court noted that defendants objection was conclusory: Although the information sought, arguably, is relevant to plaintiff’s claims, the scope of information sought is far too great.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 8, 2024
Defendants objected asserting (in part) that the request sought “information protected from disclosure by official information privilege ….” Therefore, it overruled the objection. Plaintiffs’ Request for Production No. 63 asked for production of three defendants’ “entire” personnel file. at *2, 5 (emphasis added). citation omitted). [2]
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2024
The circuit court ordered Mr. Etame to submit any objections, which he did, with some discovery responses. Bentons and (according to an affidavit) Ms. The Court held a status conference and deferred ruling for 60 days, presumably to allow Benton to provide full interrogatory answers and documents, or object to the same.
E-Discovery LLC
MARCH 5, 2025
In Tremblay, after the second denial, the court continued: It appears that Plaintiffs now seek to litigate that issue for a third time, and by doing so, it appears that the objective of the courts initial ruling (i.e.,
Evidence at Trial
DECEMBER 17, 2021
To make these showings, Crown relied on an affidavit from a Synchrony employee who attested to the following: She had "personal knowledge of the business records of Synchrony" and was "a qualified person authorized to declare and certify on behalf of Synchrony." Chambers' objections and denied the motion. Chambers failed to do so).
E-Discovery LLC
OCTOBER 6, 2024
Based on these facts, an affidavit from IT Director Mr. Hughey, and an investigation by a technology consultant, Mr. Shapiro alleged that each of the individual defendants (and thus HHI, since they were acting in their official capacities) had accessed his emails unlawfully.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content