This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ass’n , the Florida Supreme Courtruled that a Facebook friendship between a judge and an attorney, by itself, isn’t sufficient for disqualification. ABA Rule 3.5(b) b) prohibits ex parte communication with jurors unless authorized by a court order or law, including attempts to access their private social media profiles.
The trial of Rod Blagojevich, the former governor of Illinois, for example, showcased allegations of lying during the juryselection process when a juror did not disclose an arrest for DUI. The consequent debate on juror honesty underscores potential weaknesses in the juryselection mechanism.
The trial of Rod Blagojevich, the former governor of Illinois, for example, showcased allegations of lying during the juryselection process when a juror did not disclose an arrest for DUI. The consequent debate on juror honesty underscores potential weaknesses in the juryselection mechanism.
The judge also ruled on motions concerning a number of conditions Kohberger allegedly suffers from. The defense team had initially moved to have the death penalty barred due to Kohberger's autism spectrum disorder, but the courtsruled against them in 2024.
In April 2019, the Washington Supreme Court became the first court in the nation to adopt a courtrule aimed at eliminating both implicit and intentional racial bias in juryselection. Devine et al., Long-Term Reduction in Implicit Race Bias: A Prejudice Habit-Breaking Intervention, 48 J. Experimental Soc.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content