Court Rules Objections Witnesses 
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 28, 2025
It asserted prejudice because it could not call the person who took the photos as a trial witness. Defendant’s objection was overruled. The Appellate Court of Maryland affirmed. The City objected to the admission of the photographs, asserting that those photographs were “not disclosed in discovery.”
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 17, 2025
The City Defendants objected to the ESI Order. The objection was overruled. As noted, after the court ruled, the City Defendants objected to the Magistrate Judges decision. The Hall court addressed each argument and overruled all of the City Defendants objections. In Rayome v. Fed.R.Civ.P.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Lawmatics
MARCH 1, 2023
Depositions are a critical tool for building a case, and as such, it is essential for attorneys of all skill levels to be well-versed in the various objections that can arise during the course of a deposition. While some objections are straightforward, others can be more nuanced and require a deep understanding of the legal system.
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 16, 2025
In Thompson II , certain defendants failed fully to produce emails after the Court ruled that they were discoverable. The Court entered one that would conditionally preclude defendants from calling certain witnesses unless they could demonstrate that the witness had not sent or received responsive emails.
WA Bar News
JUNE 11, 2024
Fucile “[T]estimony of witnesses who were kicked by plaintiff’s attorney while the witnesses were responding to defendants’ attorney’s inquiry. because there is no way of knowing what the testimony would have been if the witnesses had been left alone.” — West v. should not be considered as evidence. Irwin (E.D.
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 22, 2025
In NJ Court Rules Police Geofence Warrants Are Constitutional (Bloomberg Law May 20, 2025), Alex Ebert reported that a New Jersey intermediate appellate court upheld a geofence warrant, within specified limits. Witnesses reported hearing that the perpetrator was speaking on a cell phone.
Percipient
APRIL 22, 2023
23, 2015) the court observed that responding parties presumptively bear the expense of complying with discovery requests unless the expense is “significant.” ” If the subpoena is issued in a state court matter, a state statute or court rule may shift the costs of subpoena compliance to the requesting party (see below).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content