E-Discovery LLC

OCTOBER 17, 2024

The court: set out the governing standard for discovery from an attorney and, denied a request to depose the attorney; but, authorized a limited interrogatory to him. They also sought the former attorney’s deposition regarding the alleged offer. Thus, those two factors weighed in favor of a deposition.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

MAY 31, 2024

Here, the burdens associated with the proposed discovery, including re-doing liability expert reports and depositions, are heavy; and the likely benefits, given the elapsed deadlines, are nil. 1, 2023)( untimely discovery objection was waived); cf. The court will deny Fiskars’ motion for this reason alone.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

DECEMBER 16, 2024

Etame did not appear for his deposition on March 10, 2022. Nguhs motions, but held the sanctions motion in abeyance, and ordered Mr. Etame to appear for deposition. After the parties discussed scheduling, Mr. Etame failed to appear for deposition. Benton filed suit, Hartley Hall propounded interrogatories and document requests.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

AUGUST 13, 2024

The Court “presided over a discovery dispute hearing related to Plaintiff’s motions to compel interrogatory requests and requests for production of documents, and related to a motion for a protective order filed by the Defendant.” Plaintiff later complained of lack of depositions. 7, 2024)(Simms, J.), That’s perfect.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

MARCH 8, 2025

The court wrote that it then adopted Defendants protocol [as an order] and no objection to that order was filed. Mistake #2: Next, Plaintiffs interrogatory responses were untimely and the U.S. See Too Busy to Respond to Discovery = Waiver of Objections & Sanctions (Nov. 2] That objection was timely. See 28 U.S.C.636(b)(1)(fourteen

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

JANUARY 15, 2025

Plaintiffs asserted, however, that Defendant insists on keeping its relevant custodians and data sources to itself (or at least forcing Plaintiffs to try and discover the same through interrogatories and depositions). emphasis added]. The Zarfati court then published an ESI Protocol. at *5, passim.

Discovery

SW&L Attorneys Blog

MARCH 15, 2025

A failure to provide the requested information without valid objections may result in a motion to compel, a procedural mechanism through which a party seeks judicial intervention to enforce compliance. The opposing party may object to discovery requests by asserting that the information sought is cumulative, duplicative, or unduly burdensome.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

JANUARY 29, 2025

21, 2025), the court wrote that: Neither side distinguishes between waiver of untimely objections to interrogatories and waiver of untimely objections to RFPs, even though important differences exist in both the applicable rules of civil procedure and the case law construing them. It held that plaintiffs waived the objections.

Interrogatories