E-Discovery LLC

JUNE 16, 2025

WMATA moved for summary judgment based on the lack of expert testimony. First , the moving party must establish that there was a duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence. That duty arises “when a party reasonably should know that the evidence may be relevant to anticipated litigation.”    Id. In response, Ms.

130

130

E-Discovery LLC

MAY 27, 2025

13, 2025)(unreported), [1] sanctions were imposed for failure to comply with discovery milestones in a scheduling order. Further: Where the asserted scheduling order violation involves a discovery failure, the trial court has wide discretion to determine what sanction, if any, is appropriate. Hyde , 2025 WL 79685 (Appl. at *1, 3, 8.

Discovery 130

Discovery Interrogatories Witnesses Evidence 130

Complex Discovery

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024

Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence. Grimm (ret.),

Evidence 111

Evidence Media and Entertainment Jury Deliberation Technology 111

E-Discovery LLC

JANUARY 28, 2025

24, 2025), the court imposed sanctions on a pro se litigant who, in the courts words, has engaged in unseemly behavior towards counsel as well as improper discovery litigation. In part, Mr. Rivera filed a motion to To obtain the appointment of a neutral expert in computer forensics. Rivera was filing meritless discovery motions.

Discovery 130

Discovery Expert Testimony Affidavits Evidence 130

E-Discovery LLC

DECEMBER 9, 2024

Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Mr. Reddick argued that the store employees testimony was insufficient for authentication, contending that the State had failed to establish a proper foundation showing the reliability of the process. Circumstantial evidence was sufficient. Lorraine v.

Witnesses 130

Witnesses Expert Testimony Chain Of Custody Evidence 130

E-Discovery LLC

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024

One of three defendants contended that the discovery propounded on it was not proportional because it was the least culpable of the three. Plaintiffs sought discovery “relat[ing] to other incidents involving Wiegand mountain coasters at Wisp Resort and elsewhere.” That is a very rigorous process, often necessitating expert testimony.

Discovery 130

Discovery Objections Admissibility Expert Testimony 130

Complex Discovery

MAY 29, 2025

Editor’s Note: This article provides a timely and detailed examination of how the rise of AI-generated content, particularly deepfakes, is challenging long-standing principles in evidence law. provides critical insights into both the psychological and procedural impacts of synthetic evidence. Grossman and Hon. Grimm (ret.)

Evidence 59

Evidence Forensic Evidence Technology Expert Testimony 59