Remove Discovery Remove Evidence Remove Interrogatories
article thumbnail

Local Rule Prohibiting Definitions in Interrogatories Without Leave of Court

E-Discovery LLC

The court cited a local rule that prohibits use of definitions in interrogatories without leave of court. Plaintiff Payne moved to compel discovery from Defendant Herman. In pertinent part, Herman objected to the definitions in Payne’s interrogatories. applies only to interrogatories. Emphasis added]. Sports Center Co.,

article thumbnail

Discovery 101 – Court Sets Out Ground Rules to Resolve Discovery Dispute

E-Discovery LLC

clearly sets out a series of rules governing discovery disputes. At a status conference, each party asserted that the other had not adequately responded to discovery requests. 5] “The rules also require objections to interrogatories and requests for production of documents to be made with specificity.” [6] 21, 2025)(Stafford, J.),

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

When Can a Party Refer to Produced Records as an Answer to an Interrogatory?

E-Discovery LLC

Plaintiff contended that, in response to plaintiffs interrogatories, Defendants improperly refer to hundreds of pages of documents, which is non-responsive, evasive, and in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). First, it must show that a review of the documents will actually reveal answers to the interrogatories.

article thumbnail

Spoliation Discovery Permitted

E-Discovery LLC

7, 2025), the court addressed a number of discovery disputes in this lawsuit by a terminated employee against her former employer. The court permitted spoliation interrogatories. Plaintiffs supplemental response stated: Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as compound. Defendants Interrogatory No. Merck & Co.,

article thumbnail

E-Discovery 101 – – A Refresher on the Scope of Discovery + Boilerplate Objections Sustained

E-Discovery LLC

9, 2024), provides a succinct summary of the scope of discovery under the December 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.” It – surprisingly – sustained boilerplate objections. The case involved a loan gone south.

article thumbnail

Two Recent Decisions Imposing Sanctions for Discovery Failures

E-Discovery LLC

26, 2024)(unreported), dismissals for discovery violations were affirmed. Nguh, one owner, propounded discovery on Mr. Etame, the opposing owner. The Appellate Court wrote: Mr. Etame failed to respond to discovery, and on March 3, 2022, Ms. Etame appealed, arguing abuse of discretion in the imposition of discovery sanctions.

article thumbnail

Sanctions for Failure to Comply With a Scheduling Order That Set Discovery Milestones

E-Discovery LLC

13, 2025)(unreported), [1] sanctions were imposed for failure to comply with discovery milestones in a scheduling order. Further: Where the asserted scheduling order violation involves a discovery failure, the trial court has wide discretion to determine what sanction, if any, is appropriate. Hyde , 2025 WL 79685 (Appl. at *1, 3, 8.