Remove Discovery Remove Evidence Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

eDiscovery Assistant Rebrands as Minerva26, Positions Its Platform as Strategic Discovery Command Center

Law Sites

eDiscovery Assistant, a platform for e-discovery case law and resources, today announced its rebranding as Minerva26. The company describes the rebrand as reflecting its evolution into a “strategic command center for discovery” designed to help litigation teams proactively manage the growing challenges of electronic evidence.

article thumbnail

Discovery 101 – Court Sets Out Ground Rules to Resolve Discovery Dispute

E-Discovery LLC

clearly sets out a series of rules governing discovery disputes. At a status conference, each party asserted that the other had not adequately responded to discovery requests. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model. _ [1] For more information on Rule 26(g), see Golden Oldie #5 – Fed.R.Civ.P.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The “Best Time” to File a Spoliation Motion

E-Discovery LLC

At the time of the spoliation motion, discovery was incomplete and no milestone for filing summary judgment motions had been set. Of course, all counsel are duty bound to promptly notify opposing counsel and the court when they have learned that relevant evidence has been spoliated. That is much like the timing of spoliation motions.

article thumbnail

No Sanctions for Breach of Duty to Preserve Video, Due to Lack of Prejudice

E-Discovery LLC

“[W]hile I find defendants negligently failed to preserve video footage, I find they are not guilty of spoliation because such footage is not responsive to plaintiff’s discovery requests or relevant.” It is triggered when a potential party has “some notice that the evidence is potentially relevant to… reasonably foreseeable litigation.”

article thumbnail

Standard for Court-Ordered Forensic Examinations – When Does Misconduct “Cross the Rubicon”?

E-Discovery LLC

This was the “umpteenth” discovery issue in a dispute that arose over a commercial acquisition deal that “went south.” These circumstances are no doubt personal for all involved—and the case involves a lot of money—which has spawned a contentious discovery process. Mintas moved to compel or for a forensic examination.

article thumbnail

More on Apex Depositions

E-Discovery LLC

But some experts have defended the doctrine by warning about the discovery abuses that Meta alleges are at play here. And, Meta asserts that, because discovery orders are not generally appealable, absent mandamus, the scope of the doctrine will not be addressed at the appellate level. Much has been written about the “apex doctrine.”

article thumbnail

Local Rule Prohibiting Definitions in Interrogatories Without Leave of Court

E-Discovery LLC

Plaintiff Payne moved to compel discovery from Defendant Herman. The Maryland Court published “Guidelines for Uniform Instructions and Definitions for Use in Discovery Requests.” Both approaches seem focused on the same goal – avoiding unreasonable, lengthy, convoluted definitions to discovery requests.