Discovery Litigation Pleadings 
E-Discovery LLC
APRIL 19, 2025
Thompson I explained the 2000 change in the scope of discovery that remains in force, with some changes, today. [1] Thompson I explained the 2000 change in the scope of discovery that remains in force, with some changes, today. [1] However, the pleadings are only the starting place. Emphasis added]. citation omitted].
E-Discovery LLC
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
9, 2024), provides a succinct summary of the scope of discovery under the December 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.” While construing relevance broadly, this Court is anchored by the parties’ pleadings. “To
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
JANUARY 4, 2025
17, 2024), the court rejected a demand that opposing counsel state under oath that counsel had properly conducted discovery. 26(g) (the stop and think rule regarding discovery) or Rule 37(a)(4) (evasive and incomplete discovery responses) to, or instead of, Rule 11. Trivest Partners L.P., 2024 WL 514015 (E.D. 6, 2024).
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 16, 2024
26, 2024)(unreported), dismissals for discovery violations were affirmed. Nguh, one owner, propounded discovery on Mr. Etame, the opposing owner. The Appellate Court wrote: Mr. Etame failed to respond to discovery, and on March 3, 2022, Ms. Etame to submit any objections, which he did, with some discovery responses.
E-Discovery LLC
MARCH 3, 2025
At its most general level, the holding was that a litigant may not invoke the courts to assert their legal rights, then engage in extralegal conduct. In the Courts words, the sanction alleviated prejudice to the employer and signals to Campbell and other litigants that one must deal honestly before the courts. 25, 2025)(Bredar, J.),
E-Discovery LLC
NOVEMBER 1, 2024
Despite several extensions of time, the defendant essentially told the court that it had been too busy to respond to discovery. Plaintiff Orlando sought discovery from defendant HKS. All objections to the discovery at issue, other than privilege, have been waived by the failure to timely respond to the discovery.”
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 31, 2024
This case is, in part, a trade secret case involving alleged misappropriation of source code, so requests seeking production of source code and related data are an expected part of discovery…. The court proceeded to resolve a number of other discovery issues. 1, 2023)( untimely discovery objection was waived); cf.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content