Evidence Expert Testimony Litigation 
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 16, 2025
WMATA moved for summary judgment based on the lack of expert testimony. First , the moving party must establish that there was a duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence. That duty arises “when a party reasonably should know that the evidence may be relevant to anticipated litigation.” Id. In response, Ms.
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 25, 2025
6] “A party objecting to a request for production of documents as burdensome must support that objection with affidavits, other evidence, or enough information to allow the Court to make a common-sense judgment.” [7] 28, 2024); How to Create a “Metadata” or “Metadata Plus” Log Using a Litigation Review Platform (Aug. 30, 2025). [6]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Sound Jury Blog
JULY 8, 2025
That difference can mean the tipping point in close litigation. They’re professionals, parents, and citizens being asked to evaluate nuanced legal theories, expert testimony, and large volumes of evidence. But when that same information is presented with relevant visuals, retention jumps to 65%.
Complex Discovery
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence.
Newport Beach California Business Litigation Law B
FEBRUARY 12, 2025
When attorneys fail to meet their obligations, it can result in major financial losses, such as significant revenue decline or business closure due to costly litigation or a damaged business reputation. If you are a business owner, what evidence do you need to confirm that legal malpractice caused your business to suffer losses?
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 9, 2024
Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Mr. Reddick argued that the store employees testimony was insufficient for authentication, contending that the State had failed to establish a proper foundation showing the reliability of the process. Circumstantial evidence was sufficient. Lorraine v.
E-Discovery LLC
JANUARY 28, 2025
24, 2025), the court imposed sanctions on a pro se litigant who, in the courts words, has engaged in unseemly behavior towards counsel as well as improper discovery litigation. In part, Mr. Rivera filed a motion to To obtain the appointment of a neutral expert in computer forensics. In Rivera v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content