Evidence Expert Testimony Litigation 
Complex Discovery
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence.
Newport Beach California Business Litigation Law B
FEBRUARY 12, 2025
When attorneys fail to meet their obligations, it can result in major financial losses, such as significant revenue decline or business closure due to costly litigation or a damaged business reputation. If you are a business owner, what evidence do you need to confirm that legal malpractice caused your business to suffer losses?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 9, 2024
Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Mr. Reddick argued that the store employees testimony was insufficient for authentication, contending that the State had failed to establish a proper foundation showing the reliability of the process. Circumstantial evidence was sufficient. Lorraine v.
E-Discovery LLC
JANUARY 28, 2025
24, 2025), the court imposed sanctions on a pro se litigant who, in the courts words, has engaged in unseemly behavior towards counsel as well as improper discovery litigation. In part, Mr. Rivera filed a motion to To obtain the appointment of a neutral expert in computer forensics. In Rivera v.
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 27, 2025
The principal function of a scheduling order is to move the case efficiently through the litigation process by setting specific dates or time limits for anticipated litigation events to occur. The Scheduling Order in Little set a milestone for identifying expert witnesses. at *3 (quotations and citation omitted). at *1, 3, 8.
IP Watchdog
APRIL 12, 2022
in which the court affirmed most of a ruling from the District of Minnesota, including sanctions against Niazi for improper use of expert testimony, as well as a finding of no induced infringement by St. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Niazi Licensing Corp. Jude Medical S.C.,
Complex Discovery
MAY 29, 2025
Editor’s Note: This article provides a timely and detailed examination of how the rise of AI-generated content, particularly deepfakes, is challenging long-standing principles in evidence law. provides critical insights into both the psychological and procedural impacts of synthetic evidence. Grossman and Hon. Grimm (ret.)
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
111 
Let's personalize your content