Evidence Expert Testimony Witnesses 
E-Discovery LLC
DECEMBER 9, 2024
31, 2024), the intermediate appellate court addressed an important issue of authentication of surveillance video by a lay witness. That witness was permitted to authenticate a video under the silent witness theory. Therefore, in his view, the evidence was not sufficiently authenticated. Lorraine v.
Complex Discovery
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
Understanding how courts may handle AI-generated evidence will be crucial for those responsible for managing digital content, ensuring data integrity, and navigating complex litigation involving digital forensics. John Tunheim, delves into how the judiciary can prepare for the impact of AI-manipulated evidence. Grimm (ret.),
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
MAY 27, 2025
The Scheduling Order in Little set a milestone for identifying expert witnesses. Mr. Little was precluded from introducing evidence of liability or damages. Appellees also alleged that appellant had failed to designate any expert witnesses. [by (quotations and citation omitted). at *1, 3, 8. July 9, 2023).
Complex Discovery
MAY 29, 2025
Editor’s Note: This article provides a timely and detailed examination of how the rise of AI-generated content, particularly deepfakes, is challenging long-standing principles in evidence law. provides critical insights into both the psychological and procedural impacts of synthetic evidence. Grossman and Hon. Grimm (ret.)
Expert Witness Blog
MARCH 29, 2025
Expert testimony played a pivotal role in this case, with both parties presenting scientific evidence to support their positions. The plaintiffs alleged that the addition of fluoride to drinking water posed an unreasonable risk of neurotoxic harm, particularly to infants and young children.
Plaintiff Trial Lawyer Tips
JUNE 27, 2024
QUALIFICATIONS 1. SEE WITNESSES biography (a) BIRTH DATE (b) MARITAL STATUS 2 GENERAL EDUCATION OUTLINE: SCHOOLS APPLIED FOR & REJECTED? GENERAL BIAS 1. Involvement in this Case: (1) HOW BECAME INVOLVED IN THIS CASE (2) INVOLVEMENT WITH EXPERT WITNESS AGENCY?
Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy
FEBRUARY 16, 2025
The difference between Pennsylvanias approach to judges and expert gatekeeping and that under the Federal Rules of Evidence is stark. That the language change was not cosmetic is made clear from the Evidence Rules Committees accompanying notes. ” Pa.R.E. But has the change made a difference? To some courts and not others.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content