E-Discovery LLC
JULY 25, 2025
5] “The rules also require objections to interrogatories and requests for production of documents to be made with specificity.” [6] 7] “Boilerplate objections are legally meaningless and amount to a waiver of an objection.” [8] 7] “Boilerplate objections are legally meaningless and amount to a waiver of an objection.” [8]
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 31, 2025
In pertinent part, Herman objected to the definitions in Payne’s interrogatories. This Court has also stated that unreasonable definitions may render interrogatories so burdensome that objections to the entire series should be sustained, with sanctions. Plaintiff Payne moved to compel discovery from Defendant Herman.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
E-Discovery LLC
JUNE 16, 2025
First , the moving party must establish that there was a duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence. That duty arises “when a party reasonably should know that the evidence may be relevant to anticipated litigation.” Id. Bad faith requires that evidence be destroyed “for the purpose of depriving the adversary of evidence.”
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 14, 2025
But some experts have defended the doctrine by warning about the discovery abuses that Meta alleges are at play here. Any decision that brings additional clarity will be important.
E-Discovery LLC
JULY 16, 2025
It is triggered when a potential party has “some notice that the evidence is potentially relevant to… reasonably foreseeable litigation.” In other words, the trigger analysis is objective, not subjective. Maryland’s High Court Affirms Sanction for Spoliation of Video Evidence Jan. 21, 2024). In one (remarkable?)
Planet Depos
JUNE 17, 2025
The chief value of a deposition, as with any discovery proceeding, is to give all litigant parties in a contested case a fair preview of the evidence so that a “level playing field” is achieved and surprise (traditionally regarded as an unfair tactic) is avoided at time of trial. Be sure you understand the question.
Temple University Beasley School of Law - Advocacy
JULY 11, 2025
And when 404(b) evidence is offered against an accused, effective lawyering means doing all one can to seek its exclusion, have it toned down, or ensure that the jury does no more harm with it than the law permits. The principle was stated as follows: When prior-bad-acts evidence floods the state’s case, counsel must act.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
Let's personalize your content