This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In legal contexts, confirmation is particularly relevant as it can significantly influence juryselection and the overall fairness of the legal process. However, confirmation bias can subtly infiltrate juryselection and significantly impact the fairness of the trial process.
After beginning his litigation career as an assistant state’s attorney and as an insurance defense attorney, in 2019 John Tolley decided to form his own firm, JT Law. JT Law is now a three-partner firm that handles insurance, civil litigation and immigration cases in Florida, New York and New Jersey.
In the previous articles of our series on confirmation bias, aka perception bias , in the legal system, we explored the profound impact of confirmation bias on juryselection and decision-making processes. Trial consultants whose strategies are premised on pseudoscience can lead to ineffective and biased juryselection.
In the previous articles of our series on confirmation bias, aka Perception Bias in the legal system, we explored the profound impact of confirmation bias on juryselection and decision-making processes. Trial consultants whose strategies are premised on pseudoscience can lead to ineffective and biased juryselection.
In the previous articles of our series on confirmation bias, aka Perception Bias in the legal system, we explored the profound impact of confirmation bias on juryselection and decision-making processes. Trial consultants whose strategies are premised on pseudoscience can lead to ineffective and biased juryselection.
In legal contexts, confirmation is particularly relevant as it can significantly influence juryselection and the overall fairness of the legal process. In this article we will lay the foundation for our deeper exploration of confirmation bias in juryselection and litigation , which will be covered in subsequent blog articles.
In legal contexts, confirmation is particularly relevant as it can significantly influence juryselection and the overall fairness of the legal process. This article will lay the foundation for our deeper exploration of confirmation bias in juryselection and litigation, which will be covered in subsequent blog articles.
Litigation can be a complex process. That’s where litigation consulting can make a difference. We seek to enhance the practice of law by supporting the work of your legal practitioner through litigation-related behavior and communication. What is Litigation Consulting? Call (972) 890-8482 for a free consultation today.
In the spirit of correcting past problems and forging new habits, here’s a list of litigation resolutions – from case intake to closing argument – to put your trial strategy either back on track or to keep it on track. This year, kill multiple birds with one jury research stone. Let’s make this year different!
Whether you’re involved in a civil case, criminal trial, or complex litigation, the jury’s composition and understanding of a case can significantly influence the verdict. In these scenarios, the expertise of a jury consultant becomes immeasurable. Call (972) 890-8482 to book an appointment today!
In our previous article, Confirmation Bias : The Science Behind its Impact on JurySelection and Litigation, we explored the concept of jury bias and its profound effects on juryselection and decision-making processes. We emphasized recognizing and addressing this cognitive bias in the legal system.
CaseSpecific QuestioningDeploy targeted prompts during juryselection to surface explicit and implicit leanings. Discover how jury questionnaires and trial lawyers can influence the outcome with Rachel Lanier. This approach supports data-driven decision-making and helps achieve fairer juryselection.
CaseSpecific QuestioningDeploy targeted prompts during juryselection to surface explicit and implicit leanings. Discover how jury questionnaires and trial lawyers can influence the outcome with Rachel Lanier. This approach supports data-driven decision-making and helps achieve fairer juryselection.
In our previous article, “Confirmation Bias: The Science Behind its Impact on JurySelection and Litigation ”, we explored the concept of confirmation bias and its profound effects on juryselection and decision-making processes. However, that role is entirely contingent on the validity of their approach.
You want to ensure that the group selected is demographically representative of the population you are interested in, and that you clearly define the exclusion criteria for your study so that participants who could confound your results are not included. The benefits of applying empirical research to litigation are numerous.
Attorneys often turn to trial consultants to help them with everything from juryselection to witness preparation. Our consultants understand the stakes during complex litigation and will help you get more prepared and confident with your claim. We have experienced El Paso trial consultants that provide a wide range of services.
Moreover, it explores the significance of scientific jury analysis in helping lawyers and litigators navigate the potential biases stemming from media exposure , empowering them to devise effective strategies. Scientific jury analysis offers valuable insights and tools to navigate the impact of media coverage effectively.
With a mock trial, you can gain unparalleled insight into your case and improve any potential areas of weakness before going in front of a jury. At Jonathan Leach, LLC , we have extensive experience helping attorneys and their clients prepare for litigation. First and foremost, a mock trial helps you prepare for litigation.
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: It has become more commonplace to hear talk about a future of litigation without peremptory strikes. After all, Arizona in 2022 was the first state to eliminate strikes in all cases, and it may not be the last. California and Washington have moved to revised schemes for exercising strikes, relying not […]
Juries in state courts, rather than federal courts, produced most nuclear verdicts. Third party litigation funding, lawsuit advertising, and plaintiffs’ lawyers’ courtroom tactics fuel the size and frequency of nuclear verdicts.
Through two years of litigation. A jury will have to decide if you're more likely right than wrong. During juryselection one of the doctors whom you sued gives in. He realizes he runs the risk a jury will find him responsible for your injuries. They also argue that your injuries aren't that bad.
With high-profile celebrity endorsements and the prosecution's lead witness removed from consideration after evidence linked to her was deemed untrustworthy just weeks before juryselection, the drama level is already cranked up. Civil litigation is also pending.
Litigants expect a fair trial, and introducing external evidence violates this expectation. As such, educational efforts and stricter controls are continuously implemented to safeguard the sanctity of jury deliberations. The consequent debate on juror honesty underscores potential weaknesses in the juryselection mechanism.
Litigants expect a fair trial, and introducing external evidence violates this expectation. As such, educational efforts and stricter controls are continuously implemented to safeguard the sanctity of jury deliberations. The consequent debate on juror honesty underscores potential weaknesses in the juryselection mechanism.
Nevertheless, one can easily speculate that there will be litigation at some point as to whether the consent was in fact informed consent and this is a risk for lawyers. For instance, the opinion includes cases in which lawyers use AI for juryselection. Related to the confidentiality issues are issues of communication.
Unfortunately, litigators who do not fit the stereotypical idea of what an oral advocate should look like must fight harder to establish credibility because, as legal scholar and Columbia Law School Professor Kimberl Crenshaw writes, what is understood as objective or neutral is often the embodiment of a white middle-class world view.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content