E-Discovery LLC

OCTOBER 28, 2024

In pertinent part, FGH served 20 subpoenas on third-party financial institutions. The Court wrote that: Under Rule 45, a party ordinarily “does not have standing to challenge a subpoena issued to a nonparty unless the party claims some personal right or privilege in the information sought by the subpoena.” Breach Litig.,

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

OCTOBER 15, 2024

July 22, 2024), the Court addressed the type of objections that a subpoenaed non-party may make. That was a novel issue in Maryland. The Court held “that [nonparty] TST had standing to challenge the subpoena on grounds that some of the requests were overbroad and not relevant to the subject matter involved in the divorce action.”

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

NOVEMBER 11, 2024

non-party TEDCO’s blanket privilege and work product objections to a subpoena were denied; however, it lived to fight another day because the denial was without prejudice to file supported objections after a “meet and confer.” Specific objections are required. And, ImpactHR responded without objection.

Objections

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 4, 2025

the Court set out and applied the principles governing subpoenas and objections to them. The individual defendants in Hall issued a subpoena to MAIP. Hall, on behalf of MAIP, objected based in part on privilege. Defendants objected to sharing. Baltimore Police Dept., 2025 WL 509130 (D. 13, 2025)(Austin, J.),

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

NOVEMBER 27, 2024

20, 2024), the court addressed recovery of expenses by non-parties for responding to a subpoena. 45 (“Subpoena”) states: (b)(1) – Under some circumstances, witness fees and mileage must be paid. [1] It is alleged that the documents were then used by the mother in litigation against the sole member of OLPC. Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 22, 2025

15, 2025), the court ordered discovery of litigation hold notices. In my opinion, and while I agree with the result, the legal issues governing the discovery of litigation hold notices and implementation need clarity and national uniformity. The EEOC served a subpoena on the third-party custodian. Aspire Regional Partners, Inc.,

Discovery

Percipient

APRIL 22, 2023

Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. Who covers the expense in responding to it? In United States v.

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 5, 2025

12, 2024); No Privilege Log Is Needed While Scope of Discovery Objections Are Pending (Aug. The individual defendants issued a sweeping subpoena to a non-party, the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project (MAIP). Both Mr. Hall and MAIP objected to the subpoena on a number of bases. Subsequently a partial log was provided.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

JANUARY 2, 2025

Plaintiff Spivey served a subpoena on non-party API. The Spivey court, however, looked to the litigants agreement. It held that the Spivey agreement to run negotiated search terms does not waive the responding partys objections to producing nonresponsive documents. API allegedly had information about the process. 29, 30, 33.

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024

The September 6, 2024, decision in In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, 2024 WL 4125618 (N.D. Meta responded that Rule 34 requests were proper and it should not be forced to serve over 200 subpoenas under Rule 45. 2024), applies the “legal control” standard to Fed.R.Civ.P.

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 22, 2025

Both sides objected to a report and recommendation of a special master. The Sports Rehab court found that the personal devices were not in Vail Healths possession, custody, or control and that the proper procedure would have been for plaintiffs to issue subpoenas. Vail Clinic, Inc., 2025 WL 1144559 (D. 11, 2025).

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

NOVEMBER 25, 2024

12, 2024), discussing In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation , 2024 WL 4125618 (N.D. Meta responded that Rule 34 requests were proper and it should not be forced to serve over 200 subpoenas under Rule 45. The court wrote: “In all thirty-two cases, the State itself is a party to the suit.

Discovery

E-Discovery LLC

DECEMBER 19, 2024

In In re Outpatient Medical Center Employee Antitrust Litigation , 2024 WL 4679083 (N.D. Objections were due by July 10 th. Plaintiffs said that SCA was served with a copy of the subpoena on March 27 th , two days prior to serving it on Dr. Fanning and well before the deposition. Fanning on March 29, 2024.

Depositions

SW&L Attorneys Blog

NOVEMBER 8, 2024

Johnson , the court awarded attorney’s fees due to one party’s financial concealment and subversion of the legal process, which prolonged litigation unnecessarily. Subpoena Financial Records. Courts favor transparency, and subpoenaed records often highlight concealment attempts. In Bollenbach v.

Finance and Banking

Simple Legal

DECEMBER 15, 2022

This enables you to objectively determine which prices are fair, uncover areas for cost savings, and identify law firms that provide the best value. For example, ALSP Percipient saved a client around $400,000 just by taking over document review and subpoena compliance for them.

Legal Services

Complex Discovery

FEBRUARY 6, 2025

In addition, well discuss how advanced and simple eDiscovery and document review strategies can address specific construction industry challenges, including: Large data sets, subpoena responses, delay claims, defect investigations and litigations, cost overruns, multi-party contract disputes, and regulatory compliance issues.

Construction

WA Bar News

APRIL 14, 2025

Their role varies with any given litigation. In another, the witness may be a former employee who can provide the institutional memory of why a company involved in litigation did or did not take particular action in the past. Fucile Fact witnesses can make a critical difference in a case. b) in Washington for context.

Witnesses

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 8, 2025

28, 2025), the court granted in part and denied in part a motion to quash subpoenas issued to AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile (the Wayfarer Parties) by Ms. Contextually, the litigation has been described in popular media. Lang, Ruling in Blake Lively’s Subpoena for Justin Baldoni Phone Records (Feb. Blake Lively.

Subpoenas

E-Discovery LLC

JANUARY 29, 2025

21, 2025), the court wrote that: Neither side distinguishes between waiver of untimely objections to interrogatories and waiver of untimely objections to RFPs, even though important differences exist in both the applicable rules of civil procedure and the case law construing them. It held that plaintiffs waived the objections.

Interrogatories