E-Discovery LLC

MAY 22, 2025

In the final step, the government compels the data company to provide the name and email address associated with the accounts police deem to be potential defendants or witnesses to a crime. 9, 2025); Requests for Tower-Dump or Tower-Extraction Search Warrants Declined Under Geofence Precedent (Mar. State , 913 S.E.2d

Evidence 130

Evidence Witnesses Forensic Evidence Technology 130

E-Discovery LLC

APRIL 9, 2025

22, 2025); Requests for Tower-Dump or Tower-Extraction Search Warrants Declined Under Geofence Precedent (Mar. This step was intended to aid the police in ruling out any devices flagged by the Anonymized List so that the identity of obvious non-witnesses and non-participants would not be revealed. A Circuit Split (Aug. In Wells v.

Affidavits 130

Affidavits Witnesses Evidence Precedent 130

E-Discovery LLC

MAY 7, 2025

28, 2024), with Requests for Tower-Dump or Tower-Extraction Search Warrants Declined Under Geofence Precedent (Mar. In this case, Detective Hylton swore an affidavit for a geofence warrant for Google users location history. No fingerprints, no witnesses, no murder weapon. 9, 2025), and Geofence Search Warrant Held Valid (Jun.

Precedent 130

Precedent Technology Evidence Affidavits 130

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

JUNE 28, 2023

I don’t think that, Greg Lambert 27:46 well, you know, we work in an industry that loves looking back at things and what kind of precedent is out there? Do you know if there’s any legal precedent? So, you know, what steps do you think can be done on these things as well? So I know, I know, deep fakes are kind of the new new rage.

Litigation 59

Litigation Education Evidence Technology 59