This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Rev Product Spotlight Justice is delayed when digitalevidence overwhelms. The post Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: Legal AI Solutions for Evidence Overload appeared first on Articles, Tips and Tech for Law Firms and Lawyers.
The publication selects five top articles to keep legal, business, and technology professionals informed about key developments in cyber discovery, data discovery, and legal discovery. Grossman weigh in on the potential for LLMs to revolutionize legal discovery. Industry leaders like Maura R.
Yesterday, I sought to defend the value of my law school course on E-Discovery & DigitalEvidence to a law Dean who readily conceded that she didn’t know what e-discovery was or why it would be an important thing for lawyers to understand. It was a bracing experience. My métier has always been litigation, to…
In family law, how you handle digitalevidence can really make or break your client’s case, especially in high-conflict scenarios. Understanding DigitalEvidenceDigitalevidence is data stored or transmitted digitally, such as emails, transaction records, social media posts, and browsing history.
Editor’s Note: The following article provides a structured and comprehensive overview of the LegalTechTalk session titled Navigating Emerging Data Sources in E-Discovery & Investigations , held on June 26, 2025. Navigating Emerging Data Sources in E-Discovery & Investigations. News Sources Makin, Tom, et al.
Editor’s Note: Cellebrite’s acquisition of Corellium marks a pivotal step in the evolution of mobile security and digital intelligence. Announced on June 5, 2025, this $200 million deal underscores a strategic alignment that empowers Cellebrite to expand far beyond its traditional expertise in digitalevidence extraction.
Key recommendations include: Pretrial Evidentiary Hearings: Judges should require early disclosure of potential deepfake-related evidence, enabling discovery and the use of expert witnesses to authenticate digital materials. For eDiscovery professionals, the stakes are particularly high.
These experts are essential in uncovering digitalevidence of war crimes, human rights abuses, and information warfare tactics. The vast amount of electronic data generated requires sophisticated eDiscovery techniques to identify, preserve, and analyze potential evidence effectively.
For eDiscovery experts, the case illustrates the complex intersection of digitalevidence, cross-border discovery, and the expanding scope of patent enforcement in cloud environments. The legal battle quickly escalated.
First, as international cyber norms develop, they may influence how digitalevidence is collected, preserved, and presented in legal proceedings, especially in cases involving multiple jurisdictions. Staying informed about these diplomatic developments is essential for maintaining robust and compliant information governance frameworks.
Early case assessment (ECA) provides an opportunity to understand documentary and digitalevidence. ” While ECA is often associated with electronic discovery and the early analysis of electronically stored information (ESI), its scope should not be so limited. .”
As more states articulate legal red lines and thresholds for cyber operations, these positions will increasingly influence norms around state responsibility, attribution, and digitalevidence.
For professionals navigating legal, regulatory, or investigative landscapes, understanding blockchain’s evolving capabilitiesfrom smart contracts to digital chain of custodyis no longer optional; it’s essential.
With AI capabilities advancing at a rapid pace, eDiscovery must evolve to include tools and methodologies that can effectively trace, preserve, and present digitalevidence that includes synthetic content.
E-Discovery and Digital Forensics: Electronic discovery (e-discovery) has become a crucial aspect of modern litigation. With the exponential growth of digital data, legal proceedings often involve vast amounts of electronically stored information (ESI). This assists legal teams in building stronger cases.
Professionals in information governance can draw parallels between the wartime handling of operational data and the challenges of managing digital information across jurisdictions and applications. Furthermore, the war highlights the evolving nature of digitalevidence.
Legal professionals across Europe and the UK are facing growing challenges due to increasing volumes of digitalevidence and cross-border legal complexities, making the introduction of DISCO’s AI-driven solutions timely and highly relevant.
Furthermore, the preservation and management of digitalevidence will be essential for ensuring accountability and compliance in the face of legal and geopolitical challenges. Disinformation campaigns and the need for secure international data-sharing underscore the importance of robust information governance frameworks.
Each field, while distinct, intersects significantly when handling digitalevidence, particularly in sensitive scenarios such as war crime investigations. In war crime investigations, geolocation verification ensures that digitalevidence withstands scrutiny from courts, international tribunals, and global audiences.
For legal discovery teams or regulators, this opacity creates friction in auditability and risk modeling. While the actual impact of these tactics remains difficult to measure, the existence of high-fidelity deepfakes already complicates digitalevidence chains. Data provenance is becoming especially fraught.
Legal professionals across Europe and the UK are facing growing challenges due to increasing volumes of digitalevidence and cross-border legal complexities, making the introduction of DISCO’s AI-driven solutions timely and highly relevant. Read the update. Read the update. Read the update.
With the release of READI for Email, the data services firm has expanded its Remote Endpoint Analysis and Data Intelligence (READI ) Suite to tackle one of the most persistent digitalevidence pain points: email triage.
These cases highlight: The importance of robust cyber defenses and incident response strategies to counter both digital and physical threats. The growing need for advanced eDiscovery and forensic tools to identify, preserve, and analyze digitalevidence arising from espionage and sabotage operations.
Additionally, its integration of text-to-speech and speech-to-text functionalities broadens accessibility to digitalevidence, ensuring that linguistic and auditory diversity within legal teams or stakeholders is no longer a barrier to efficient eDiscovery workflows.
Meanwhile, eDiscovery professionals face new challenges as AI-enhanced cyber crime complicates the verification of digitalevidence, necessitating a focus on securing supply chains and mitigating advanced risks.
However, when seeking digitalevidence, officers must demonstrate at least the same level of supporting information necessary to justify the search of physical places and things. This blog was initially posted on Electronic Discovery Reference Model and JD Supra. Emphasis added].
This approach aligns with the growing need for comprehensive policies that address the challenges of managing and protecting information in an increasingly complex digital landscape.
Legal discovery processes often rely on robust journalism and independent media archives to establish the authenticity and provenance of digitalevidence. The erosion of these resources increases the risk of critical data loss for litigation, compliance, and investigative purposes.
For professionals in cybersecurity and information governance, the conflict continues to underscore how modern warfare reshapes digital landscapes, complicates data sovereignty, and reinforces the need for resilient infrastructures.
Marathe believes deep fakes have the potential to severely impact the integrity of evidence and the trial process if the legal system is unprepared. E-discovery professionals are on the front lines of detecting deep fakes used as evidence, according to Marathe. So yeah, that’s that’s the that’s the discovery portion of it.
Editor’s Note: Generative AI is reshaping industries, and the legal community is facing pressing challenges, particularly concerning the authenticity of digitalevidence. Citron and Robert Chesney coined the term “liar’s dividend” to describe how deepfakes can be weaponized to discredit authentic evidence.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content