This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Viking Corporation , the testimony of a Fire Sprinkler Systems Expert Witness played a crucial role in resolving a dispute related to an unintended discharge from a fire suppression system, which caused substantial property damage. The sprinkler system, designed and manufactured by Viking Corporation, had only recently been installed.
27, 2023), the testimony of a Labels & Warnings Expert Witness played a pivotal role in assessing whether a consumer product’s labeling sufficiently warned users about potential health risks, specifically in a lawsuit involving claims of skin depigmentation.
7, 2023), the testimony of a Power Tools Expert Witness was central to evaluating claims of product liability and negligence involving a compound miter saw that allegedly caused serious injury to the user. the manufacturer of a DeWalt DW716 Type 2 compound miter saw.
2019), the testimony of a Utilities Expert Witness was central to addressing allegations of product defects and evaluating the performance and reliability of electrical transformers supplied to a utility company. based manufacturer of electrical transformers. In the case of Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. Howard Industries, Inc. ,
1996), the testimony of a Materials Expert Witness was pivotal in addressing allegations of trade secret misappropriation and unfair competition in the industrial manufacturing sector. In the case of Gates Rubber Company v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. , Continue reading
the expertise of a Biomechanics Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a tragic motor vehicle collision that resulted in severe injuries to a toddler, raising questions about the safety and design of a booster seat manufactured by the defendant, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. Introduction In the recent case of Trice v.
13, 2024), the testimony of a Plastics Expert Witness was pivotal in evaluating claims related to environmental contamination allegedly caused by the defendants plastic manufacturing processes. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. , 1:16-CV-917 (LEK/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. and Honeywell International Inc.,
This case prominently featured the involvement of a Fire Expert Witness to assess the causes and contributing factors of the fire. the manufacturer of the cladding materials, alleging that the company’s products were defective and contributed to the fire’s severity. Continue reading
The involvement of a Products Liability Expert Witness was central to the court’s analysis. Plaintiffs in this MDL alleged that exposure to paraquat, manufactured by Syngenta and distributed by Chevron, led to the development of Parkinson’s disease.
Tax Court 2021), the testimony of an Apparel & Textile Industry Expert Witness was pivotal in evaluating the legitimacy of research and development (R&D) tax credits claimed by a fashion designer. In the case of Leon Max v. Commissioner , T.C. 2021-37 (U.S. Continue reading
2010), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan addressed the admissibility of testimony from an electrical engineering expert witness in a subrogation claim following a house fire. Case Background Meemic Insurance Company, the plaintiff, insured a residence that suffered significant damage due to a fire.
The testimony of a Forklifts Expert Witness was central to the court’s analysis. Case Background On May 18, 2001, Jason Robinson, the plaintiff, was operating a stand-up forklift designed and manufactured by Crown Equipment Corporation (the defendant) at a plant in West Memphis, Arkansas.
The involvement of a Ladders & Scaffolds Expert Witness was central to the court’s analysis. Case Background Plaintiff Michael Lehmann sustained injuries after falling from a scaffold manufactured by Louisville Ladder Inc.
Summary: Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness allowed to provide testimony even though the defendant’s argued that he was not qualified to offer an opinion on miters saws as he does not have the requisite experience on the topic. The plaintiff hired Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness Dr. Charles E. Home Depot USA, Inc.
26(a) initial disclosures, “which do not identify a single corporate witness by name, much less the subject(s) of information possessed by each witness,” were inadequate. In my words, the Kinnee court denied a joint motion to approve an ESI Protocol because the defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 5, 2024), where the court in Orlando Health, Inc.
Overview: Automotive Engineering Expert Witness testimony allowed in part because the court concluded that Bloch’s testimony that alternative designs of the Silverado would have saved the plaintiff’s life was unreliable. The plaintiff hired Automotive Engineering Expert Witness Byron Bloch to provide expert witness testimony.
that creates a powerful mental framework — something we call a ‘schema’ — that can induce witnesses to simply agree to many of the Reptile’s extreme safety questions” Dr. Broda-Bahm goes on to suggest ways a witness can be taught to avoid agreeing with absolutes in questions posed by the plaintiff lawyer about safety duties.
Doug Austin wrote an interesting blog, Police May be Coming for Your Tesla as a Potential Crime Witness (ediscoverytoday.com) (Sept. The agency warned car manufacturers earlier this year it “will take action to protect consumers against the illegal collection, use, and disclosure of their personal data.”
If the driver does not, even for an instant, and someone is hurt, the driver is responsible for the harm A manufacturer is never allowed to needlessly endanger the public. We will be presenting specific testimony from qualified witnesses to demonstrate how the defendant’s conduct violated these rules.”
All of these are major pharmaceutical companies with extensive histories and significant roles in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of medications – and one in particular: ranitidine. It was responsible for manufacturing and distributing the drug in the U.S. You might recognize it better as Zantac. during that period.
Trade secrets, such as formulas, manufacturing processes, or customer lists, non-disclosure agreements, and other security measures will protect them. Witness Statements and Testimonies Professional translations of witness statements and testimonies enable you to assess the evidence provided by individuals with diverse linguistic backgrounds.
Trade secrets encompass confidential business information that offers an economic edge, like proprietary algorithms, datasets, manufacturing techniques, or consumer insights. ConnectU provided emails and witnesses confirming Zuckerberg had improperly taken source code and the idea for his competing social network.
a Pools & Spas Expert Witness played a central role in evaluating the safety and design of an above-ground pool involved in a tragic drowning incident. Background of the Case In 2021, Ellieanna Justice, a six-year-old girl, tragically drowned after climbing into a four-foot-deep above-ground pool manufactured by Bestway (USA), Inc.
1992), the testimony of an Adhesives Expert Witness played a central role in evaluating the scientific basis for claims that chemical exposure from industrial adhesives caused a workers cancer. In the case of Bell v. Swift Adhesives, Inc. , and Ashland Chemical, Inc. Continue reading
137 (1999), the role of a Tires Expert Witness was central to the proceedings and had a profound impact on the standards for admitting expert testimony in U.S. Carlson intended to testify that, based on his expert opinion, a defect in the tire’s manufacture or design was responsible for the blowout. Carmichael , 526 U.S.
We use effective storytelling, demonstrative evidence, and witness testimony to make the injurys effects tangible for jurors, establishing defense arguments that the harm is exaggerated or unrelated.
Lawsuits Against Parts Manufacturer Was anything done about it, from a legal standpoint? Many claim that the plane’s manufacturers are responsible. For example, Spirit AeroSystems (not to be confused with Spirit Airlines) is a major non-OEM aerostructures manufacturer that supplies parts like fuselages to Boeing.
This is the witness who says, "I just came from outside and it’s raining." If the witness is believed, the fact it is raining is conclusively true. Section 411 says that except where a statute may require additional evidence, direct evidence from just one witness may be sufficient. The witness may say, "I saw Ms.
Fire from the Sky: The Reality Behind Ceasefire Rhetoric Contrasting starkly with the diplomatic narrative, April 4 witnessed a deadly Russian ballistic missile strike in the central Ukrainian city of Kryvyi Rih. Sixteen civilians, including children, were killed when the missile obliterated residential structures and a playground.
So there’s there’s a lot of industry, manufacturing, and other kind of interesting companies and projects. And, you know, forum search, and nested Boolean, some brackets and, and then we showed him how to do its wits, Assisted Review of learning. And we would let them play around with Boolean search of fuzzy search and everything.
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Second Circuit affirms an attorneys’ fee award to Spanish Broadcasting System after finding that key plaintiff witness was “basically making up his testimony”; Circuit Judge Reyna calls out the Federal Circuit’s Section 101 analysis under Alice; Senator Tillis renews call to end U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content